10-29-1990 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e City Council Minutes October 29, 1990 Page 5 any evidence Councilmember remain as it the Counci I permit. shown that there is an odor problem in 1990. Kropuenske indicated that he felt the language should is in the conditional use permit. It was the consensus of to leave the language in Paragraph 13 as it is in the It was the consensus of the Council that Paragraphs 17, 21a and 23 remain as drafted. Paragraph 20: It was noted that the word residue be stricken in this paragraph except at the start of the second sentence. Paragraph 21d: The City Attorney indicated that there are separate negotiations being held regarding the tax status of the RDF which could affect this paragraph. It was the consensus of the Council that the language of Paragraph 21d be consistent with any other agreements with the overall facility of the RDF Plant and UPA burners. UPA - Solid Waste Facility License It was the consensus of the Council that the language in the Solid Waste License remain as it is in the draft license. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing on the UPA license and CUP at this time. Ron Mhyre questioned why the word residue was stricken from the language of the conditional use permit. He further questioned whether this residue is tested. Dan McConnan of UPA stated that the residue is a limestone and it has been tested and does meet the MPCA limits. Ron Mhyre indicated that he had a complaint about noise from the plant. He stated that.~ the noise was due to a back-up signal and requested that the signal be turned down. The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that the signal is as required according to OSHA standards. Mr. Mhyre indicated that he wanted to go on record as stating that the RDF and UPA facilities were a mistake and that he does not want to see the license or conditional use permit renewed. There being no other comments for or against the matter, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing.