05-21-1990 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes May 21, 1990 Page 11 tit 2. THAT THE PETITIONERS RESPONSIBLE FOR SEWER AND WATER LINES TO SERVE ALL THREE PARCELS AND THAT THOSE SEWER ANDWATER STUB-INS ARE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE RECORDING OF THESE LOTS. FURTHER, THAT THOSE SEWER AND WATER LINES ARE CONTAINED IN AN EASEMENT. LASTLY, THAT FINAL APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN FOR THE SEWER AND WATER LINES AND INSPECTION IS AS PER CITY ENGINEER, TERRY MAURER. 3. THAT $700 IN PARK DEDICATION FEE IS PAID FOR THE TWO NEWLY CREATED LOTS WITH THIS LOT SPLIT. 4. THAT THE PETITIONER PROVIDE THREE NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPERTY AND A DESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT TO THE CITY FOR RECORDING. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5..0. 6.10 Conditional Use Permit Reauest by Commercial ASDhalt ComDany/Public Hearin~/CU-90-008 tit Mayor Tralle explained to the Council that Commercial Asphalt Company (Barton Sand and Gravel) was requesting a conditional use permit to operate a temporary asphalt plant at their gravel pit. In 1988. a conditional use permi t was issued to allow a temporary asphalt plant, however, since that time the property was rezoned to R1-a/Single Family Residential. He stated that the gravel pit is therefore a legal, nonconforming use within this district. Arlon Fuchs, Planning Commission representative, stated that the Planning Commission had reviewed this request and had unanimously recommended approval with sixteen stipulations. Mayor Tralle opened the public hearing. Al Pfeifle, 20481 Auburn Street N.W.. came forward and stated that when the temporary asphalt plant was originally put in two years ago, Barton's received input from the neighboring property owners regarding the location of the plant and had agreed to place it at a certain location. He stated that the plant has since been moved to another location which was not agreed upon by Barton and the neighbors. Dick Peterson of Barton Sand and Gravel stated that the plant had been moved up the hill in order to solve two problems; air emission and water problems. He stated that he felt that the plant was still within the constraints of the originally approved conditional use permit. Mr. Peterson estimated that the plant had been moved approximately 250 feet to the northeast. - Steve Rohlf ,Building and Zoning Administrator, encouraged Mr. Pfeifle to contact staff if any problems concerning odor resulted. Mayor Tralle questioned what weather conditions would result in increased odor. Dick Peterson explained that the recycling of asphalt creates odor and that on rainy days the aggregate and the recycled asphalt are wetter, therefore, creating a ste8.JllY environment in the drum drier. He also explained that during an inversion the fumes are not dispersed,