04-16-1990 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes April 16, 1990 Page 8 e area is commercial, which was also indicated by the City's Planning Consultant, and further that seven owners agree with this request. Councilmember Holmgren indicated that because of this he would be voting in favor of the zone change to C-3. Mayor Tralle stated that it would be poor planning to develop the property in a piecemeal fashion. He stated that the Council should look at what is best for the City and what is the most logical way to develop. He stated that he would not like to see the prime piece of property taken out and the rest of the property left to be developed at a later date and that he would prefer to see the project take longer and have the City come up with a better design and possibly go with a PUD. Theresa Alverue of 616 Proctor stated that she felt if the whole area did not develop at one time the development would not be a good idea. The Building and Zoning Administrator indicated that traffic and drainage of the area are very critical issues. Mr. Enstad indicated that according to the Building and Zoning Administrator, the building department would have the authority to deny building permits if al tering the drainage or flow of surface water to nearby streets or premises would cause damage. e There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 90-6, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ELK RIVER ZONING MAP TO ZONE CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO C-3. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Mayor Tralle opposed. The Elk River City Council recessed from 9:10 p.m to 9:20 p.m. 5.9 Easement Vacation Barthel Construction/P.H. Mayor Tralle indicated that Barthel Construction has withdrawn this request. 5.11 Interpretation Alterations to Landscapin~ Elk River Ford The Building and Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Scott Powell is the new ownber of Country Chrysler and is proposing changes to the landscaping on the site. The Building and Zoning Administrator questioned whether the Council felt that changes to the landscaping would necessitate a review of the conditional use permit. He further indicated that the Planning Commission unanimously agreed that the changes to the landscaping would not necessitate a review of the conditional use permit because it does not intensify the use. e COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED THAT THE LANDSCAPING ALTERATIONS WOULD NOT REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW FOR ELK RIVER COUNTRY CHRYSLER. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.