10-21-1991 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e City Council Minutes October 21, 1991 Page 10 the City address the possibility of no parking on Main Street. Steve Rohlf distributed a memo from the Police Chief recommending that no parking take place on Main Street from Highway 169 westbound to the western boundary of Dr. Johnson's office. Dick Elliot, representing the Guardian Angels, stated he had no objection to the concept. Mr. Elliot raised several issues concerning drainage, the fire lane, and the garbage issue. Steve Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator, responded to Mr. Elliot by indicating that these issues have been taken care of during the City's review. There being no further comments, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. THAT A PRIVATE ROAD AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. 2. THAT ALL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS NECESSITATED BY CONSTRUCTION OF THIS BUILDING AND SERVING IT WITH SEWER AND WATER, STORM DRAINAGE, AND ROAD BE BORNE BY THE DEVELOPER. 3. THAT ALL DUMPSTERS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE THE BUILDING BE SCREENED. ALSO THAT THE PLANTINGS SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO SCREEN THIS BUILDING FROM GUARDIAN ANGEL'S PROPERTY BE MADE UP OF EVERGREENS TO PROVIDE 80% OPACITY. 4. THAT THE PONDING AREA ON THE NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY BE REGRADING SO THAT IT HOLDS THE CAPACITY REQUIRED PRIOR TO A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BEING ISSUED FOR THIS BUILDING. 5. THAT ALL PLANS, AS SUBMITTED, BE ADHERED TO UNLESS STAFF APPROVES MINOR ALTERATIONS. MAJOR ALTERATIONS WOULD NECESSITATE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. 6. THAT ALL PARKING AND DRIVES BE BORDERED BY CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 7. THAT THE DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING NOT BE USED FOR PUBLIC OR EMPLOYEE PARKING. THE WEST SIDE OF THIS PARTICULAR DRIVE MUST BE MARKED "FIRE LANE, NO PARKING" AND THE EAST SIDE STRIPED AND MARKED TO IDENTIFY IT AS A LOADING ZONE. 8. THAT THE CITY ACCEPT THE DEVELOPER'S CRITERIA FOR WALL SIGNAGE WITH THE ADDITION THAT SIGNAGE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING NOT BE DIRECTLY LIT. 9. THAT LIGHTING BE AS PER CITY CODE. 10. THAT DRAINAGE CANNOT BE DIRECTED WEST PAST THE CURB LINE. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0.