04-11-1991 CC MIN - BOR - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Equalization Minutes April 11, 1991 Page 4 e to the quality of the building, he cannot charge any more for renting his buildings than the surrounding buildings because of the fact that the people will pay the lower price. The County assessor indicated that next year the Assessor's Office is considering another approach to assessing these rental units. He indicated that they are going to try to look at the units according to income versus expenses and assess accordingly. The Assessor explained that the appraisal this year was based on the Marshall and Swift Book and that all other rental units were appraised on these qualifications. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED THAT THE APPRAISAL FOR PROPERTIES 75-432-0110 AND 75-432-0120 REMAIN AT $76,300 AND $96,300 AS SET BY THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 3-0. Councilmember Schuldt was away from the table during this vote. 8. S.{~RBURNE--1QpGE . KEN WARNEKE - 75-402-P255 Vacant Lot $6,000 AND 75-~QZ::.Q21L3_.'pommercial $240 I@O e Mr. Warneke explained that last year the assessed value was $226,300 for the commercial property. The Assessor's Office explained that the land value has increased and the price per square foot for the building also increased in 1991. Mr. Warneke questioned whether the vacant lot which is appraised at $6,000 could be assessed as part of the commercial property. He indicated that the lot is actually the parking lot for the property. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED THAT THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE CLASSIFY THE VACANT LOT 74-402-0255 AS PART OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY 75-402-0253 COMBINING THE TWO AND ASSESSING AS ONE PARCEL. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 9. !JOHN CURTIS 75-126_-.-1101 Residentia,Ull.lli.800 Mr. Curtis explained that during a project done by the City to upgrade Tyler Street, a guardrail was placed in his yard and stated that this guardrail project caused an unsightliness which could devalue his property. After discussion by the Board of Review, it was the consensus to have the appraiser reassess the property as it has not been assessed since the guardrail has been put on the property. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO TABLE ANY DECISION ON THIS PROPERTY UNTI L THE ASSESSOR HAS MADE A REASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTY. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 10. PARHEtLPJ!E.FJ 75_:Jl~t-.-Z31ULR~!lidential~70,J)~(received by ma.HI e Ty Bischoff explained that he talked to Ms. Duffy prior to the meeting. He stated that her home was arbitrarily assessed due to the fact that they could not get in the home to assess the property. Arrangements with Ms. Duffy to reappraise the home.