My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1.b. BASR 02-27-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
02-27-2018
>
4.1.b. BASR 02-27-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2018 9:31:40 AM
Creation date
2/22/2018 9:31:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
2/27/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\V\V 18-02 Barrett\4-Board of Adjustments\V 18-02 sr-b PC 2-27-18 LOT <br />WIDTH.docx <br />1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, and <br /> <br />The general purpose and intent of the lot width ordinance is to distribute lots and driveways <br />fronting a right-of-way in accordance to the density of the zoning district. This provides for a <br />uniformed layout of properties and allowing for proper separations between structures. The <br />property has enough length to meet the required widths for three lots but the presence of various <br />wetlands limits where property lines can be located. This in turn affects where driveways can be <br />located. The intent to allow three lots in the length of right-of-way is met. <br /> <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />The subject parcel is guided for residential which allows for orderly residential development. The <br />request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying <br />with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br /> <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to use the property in a manner as permitted by the ordinance. The <br />single lot width variance would not be required if wetlands were not present. The applicant is not <br />requesting more lots than the property can support or is allowed by the ordinance. <br /> <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of <br />the petition's own action or inaction; and <br /> <br />The plight of the petitioner is not due to their own action or inaction. The presence of wetlands <br />is beyond their control. <br /> <br />5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> <br />The essential character will not be altered as the subject property can support three parcels in size <br />comparable to the locale. <br /> <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br /> <br />Council Meeting <br />If denied, or an appeal is made by any interested party by March 9, 2018, this item will go to the March <br />19, 2018, City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> Location Map <br /> Applicants Narrative <br /> Site Plan
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.