My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 02-05-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
02-05-2018
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 02-05-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2018 11:52:03 AM
Creation date
2/2/2018 10:09:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
2/5/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Minutes Page 4 <br />January 2, 2018 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br /> Ms. Othoudt explained the city’s rental housing program and how the city ultimately <br />determines if a property is rentable. She stated the standards may differ from a private rental <br />property company. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chuba stated he didn’t understand the differences in rental standards but to <br />him he felt it a waste of money for the property owner to make the improvements outlined <br />in the first amendment of the purchase agreement if the Commission decides to tear the <br />home down once it obtains ownership. He stated his preference would be to tear down the <br />home. <br /> <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated the list of repair items could be modified if the Commission so chose. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Ovall stated he felt the two options at hand are no repairs are made to the <br />property and after closing, the Commission demolishes the home; or the current owner <br />could do the repairs as outlined so the Commission can get the property repaired and back <br />on the tax rolls after purchasing. He stated he sees merits to both options but to do the <br />improvements isn’t directionally consistent with the intentions of the Commission to speed <br />up the timeframe of redeveloping these properties. <br /> <br /> Motion by Commissioner Chuba and seconded by Commissioner Ovall to proceed <br />with the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement not requiring the list of <br />improvements as outlined in the amendment for the property at 326 Gates Ave. and <br />with a closing date of February 2, 2018. <br /> <br />Motion carried 3-0 with Commissioner Kuester abstaining. <br /> <br />The HRA recessed at 6:12 p.m. to go into work session. The HRA reconvened at 6:15 p.m. <br /> <br />8.1 Trunk Hwy. 10 and Main Street Redevelopment <br /> Ms. Othoudt presented the staff report. She explained the proposal needs to be more <br />specific and narrow down their vision and preferences for the redevelopment of the area. <br />She explained another concept to consider of an innovation center and what that type of <br />opportunity could provide to the neighborhood and small business development sector. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the HRA to meet with various potential developers to seek their <br />feedback on the types of developments that are best suited or desired for the TH 10 and <br />Main Street redevelopment area to assist the Commission in narrowing their vision and assist <br />in finalizing their proposal. <br /> <br />9. Adjournment <br /> <br />Chair Toth adjourned the meeting at 6:32 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />Minutes prepared by Jennifer Green. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.