My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.1. SR 01-02-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2018
>
01-02-2018
>
10.1. SR 01-02-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2017 3:17:05 PM
Creation date
12/28/2017 3:53:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/2/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From EfficientGov-August 18, 2017 <br />Food Trucks Sue Cities Over Distance Ordinances <br />From Baltimore to Branson,Mo., some food truck <br />vendors say cities' distance ordinances destroy them, and <br />then are fighting back in court. Food trucks argue that <br />local distance ordinances can choke their fledgling <br />industry, and disenfranchise their abilities to make <br />aIjliving. Fights over food truck distance restrictions are <br />beginning to play out in court. <br />A Baltimore judge on Aug. 14, ruled that a lawsuit brought against the cite by two food truck owners <br />should go to trial in late September. The suit against the 1Vlaryland cite, filed last near,is in an <br />attempt to change local restrictions. <br />The complainants, who own the trucks Pizza di Joey and MindGrub Cafe, are contesting the <br />ordinance that forbids food trucks from operating within 300 feet of a brick-and-mortar store that <br />sells a similar foodproproduct, accordingmg to an article m the 7rr, s YY1YY <br />Street Vendor Defenders <br />Representing the Baltimore mobile restaurateurs is The Institute for Justice (IJ), a Virginia-based <br />nonprofit law firm that has championed and represented the food-truck industry for several years. <br />IJ's position is that similar laws restricting food trucks are unconstitutional and protect immobile <br />restaurants. <br />Customers, not city hall, should decide where and from whom then buv things," said Robert <br />Frommer, senior attorney at IJ and executive director of its National Street Vending Initiative. <br />The lawsuit is the latest to fall under the umbrella of IJ's National Street Vending Initiative, "a <br />nationwide effort to vindicate the right of street vendors to earn an honest living by fighting <br />unconstitutional vending restrictions in courts of law and the court of public opinion," ,c ;o) <br />rdi , <br />O, rod <br />Competition is the American way," Frommer said. "It makes us all work harder to provide a better <br />product to our customers, and state and local government should be encouraging it not shutting it <br />down." <br />Punishing ista ce Ordinances <br />Similarly, IJ also represents two food-truck owners from Louisville, Kv., suing the city over its 150- <br />foot proximity restrictions on trucks selling food similar to nearby restaurants without their <br />permission. Mobile vendors face fines and the threat of having trucks shut down or towed if they <br />break this law. <br />The Louisville j'r; was filed June 28th in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.