My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
3/15/2005 2:34:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
10/12/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />October 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Another statute, M.S. 429.051, allows the City to not assess certain <br />properties at this time. A third Statute, M.S. 429.061, allows cities <br />to defer assessments against unimproved property until a designated <br />future year, until the property is platted, or until improvements are <br />constructed on the property. Interest on the deferred assessments can <br />be made payable annually, can be added to the principal amount, or can <br />be forgiven. <br /> <br />Bud Houlton requested the Council to grant the large land owners the <br />same opportunities that was granted to the existing single family homes <br />that were excluded from the trunk assessments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmgren stated that he prefers Option #2 in the staff <br />memo to the Mayor and City Council dated October 8. Option #2 would <br />allow the City to assess the project to all benefitted property owners, <br />but allows the elimination of interest on the assessment to farm lands <br />for two years. Councilmember Holmgren requested the City Attorney to <br />pursue this alternative and to incorporate it into the Assessment <br />Manual. Bud Houlton stated that two years would not be enough time as <br />his intent is not to develop the farm land. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz stated that he would not be in favor of a general <br />levy to carry the debt that would be created by eliminating the <br />interest on the assessments for the farm lands. <br /> <br />councilmember Kropuenske stated that options #2 <br />the Mayor and City Council dated October 8 <br />Moldenhauer development; however, these options <br />Houlton or Kincanon farm property. <br /> <br />and #3 in the memo to <br />would benefit the <br />would not benefit the <br /> <br />Gordon Moldenhauer stated that the City is forcing people to develop <br />their land with the proposed assessments. He requested that the City <br />delete the interest on the Green Acre land. He stated that the taxes <br />from the developed lots would cover the cost of the interest. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schuldt stated his concern regarding a city-wide <br />cover the deferred interest on the farm land. He stated he was <br />to any type of levy for this purpose. <br /> <br />levy to <br />opposed <br /> <br />Mr. Kincanon stated that the assessments against his property were too <br />high. He stated that he has been offered $7,500 per acre for his <br />property and that he would not make a profit from the property due to <br />the high amount of the assessment. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Mayor Tralle closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN <br />AMENDMENT TO THE ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH OPTION #2 IN <br />THE MEMO TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATED OCTOBER 8 WHICH DEFERS THE <br />ASSESSMENT FOR TWO YEARS ON TILLABLE, GREEN ACRE PROPERTY AND FORGIVES <br />INTEREST FOR THE PERIOD OF DEFERRAL. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED <br />THE MOTION. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.