08-17-1992 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

city Council Minutes August 17, 1992 Page 7 . Councilmember Kropuenske indicated that he would like to see the proposed ordinance amendment less restrictive by limiting the number of times per year to two, and limiting the number of signs per event to eight. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 92-23, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 900.22 SIGN REGULATIONS (SUBDIVISION) (4A) (VII) SIGNS PERMITTED IN ALL ZONES WITH THE AMENDMENTS LISTED BY COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. Steve Rohlf indicated that there was a sign ordinance amendment before the Council pertaining to signs permitted in Highway Commercial Zones. He stated that he is recommending that this amendment be.referred back to the Planning Commission for further review as there is some confusion regarding the interpretation of this ordinance. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO CONTINUE A DECISION ON AMENDMENT REGARDING SECTION 900.22, SUBDIVISION (4D) (IV) HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL SIGNS. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. THE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO SECONDED THE . Al Nadeau, Planning Commission Representative, indicated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment pertaining to window signs with a recommendation that the window signs do not involve more than 50% of the window area. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 92-24, AN AMENDING SECTION 900.22 SIGN REGULATIONS SUBDIVISION (3C) REQUIRING PERMITS." COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED CARRIED 4-0. ORDINANCE "SIGNS NOT THE MOTION The Council permitted that the ordinance discussed the off-premise directional signs which are in agricultural and residential zones. Al Nadeau indicated Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment which allows directional signs in A-I and R-l zones. Mr. Kennedy indicated that he has a suggested that the ordinance amendment directional signs instead of two. He individual directional signs be allowed feet. rural based business and allow for four off-premise further suggested that the to be larger than nine square COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION ~00.22 SUBDIVISION 4B VII AMENDMENTS: 92-25, WITH AN THE ORDINANCE FOLLOWING 1. THAT THE RURAL BASED BUSINESS SIGNS BE ALLOWED FOUR OFF-PREMISE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. . 2. THAT THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS NOT EXCEED 18 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE. COUNCI LMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0.