Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Elk River City Council Minutes <br />April 21, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Lavina Hoselton - Lot 3, Part of Lot 2, Block 4, Westwood <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment $6,376.83 <br />Proposed Assessment $5,621.73 <br />Appraisal Benefit $10,000.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL BY LAVINA HOSELTON <br />BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH INDICATES THAT THE BENEFIT IS <br />HIGHER THAN THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Joyce Nichols - 18967 Concord Street NW <br /> <br />Parcel #1 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment. <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />Parcel #2 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />$6,102.63 <br />$6,102.63 <br />$9,000.00 <br /> <br />$6,102.63 <br />$6,102.63 <br />$8,750.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL FOR BOTH PARCELS OF <br />PROPERTY OWNED BY JOYCE NICHOLS BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH <br />INDICATES THAT THE BENEFIT IS HIGHER THAN THE ASSESSMENT TO BOTH <br />PARCELS OF PROPERTY. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Marvin and Lorraine Weaver - 12815 Meadowvale Road <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment $9,039.93 <br />Proposed Assessment $7,934.43 <br />Appraisal Benefit $10,000.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO DENY <br />WEAVER BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT <br />IS HIGHER THAN THE ASSESSMENT. <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />Roger Tarnowski - 18881 Boston Street <br /> <br />Parcel #1 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />Parcel #2 <br /> <br />Mailed Assessment <br />Proposed Assessment <br />Appraisal Benefit <br /> <br />THE APPEAL FROM MARVIN AND LORRAINE <br />WHICH INDICATES THAT THE BENEFIT <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE <br /> <br />$12,021.06 <br />$11,014.26 <br />$17,500.00 <br /> <br />$10,236.33 <br />$10,236.33 <br />$17,500.00 <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL FOR BOTH PARCELS OF <br />PROPERTY OWNED BY ROGER TARNOWSKI BASED ON THE APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH <br />INDICATES THAT THE BENEFIT IS HIGHER THAN THE ASSESSMENT FOR BOTH <br />PARCELS OF PROPERTY. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />