Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elk River City Council Meeting <br />October 25, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />opportunity to install conduits for future extension of sanitary sewer <br />and watermain to the East Highway 10 corridor in conjunction with <br />MnDOT's project. He indicated that staff is therefore recommending <br />that the issue of conduits for future sanitary sewer and water <br />extensions be dropped at this point. <br /> <br />Terry Maurer indicated that the comprehensive drainage plan calls for a <br />72 inch diameter storm sewer line from the railroad line through the <br />MnDOT interchange to the Mississippi River. Terry Maurer stated that <br />MnDOT's final design of the Trunk Highway 10/101/169 interchange does <br />not provide enough elevation difference to install a 72 inch diameter <br />culvert. He further indicated that in order to get comparable capacity <br />in a smaller size culvert, three parallel 42 inch diameter culverts <br />would need to be installed. He indicated that this would be much more <br />costly than the installation of one larger diameter pipe. He stated <br />that the cost would be between $525,000 and $600,000. Terry Maurer <br />further indicated that if the City decided to install only one 42 inch <br />culvert to save money, the affect would be increased ponding <br />requirements upstream. He further indicated that it is unlikely that <br />the DNR and Army Corps of Engineers will allow this amount of ponding. <br />He recommended that the City proceed through MnDOT to include the three <br />42 inch diameter pipes in the MnDOT project with the option to <br />eliminate one or two of them depending on the construction costs. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO INCLUDE THREE 42 INCH DIAMETER PIPES IN <br />THE MNDOT PROJECT WITH THE OPTION TO ELIMINATE ONE OR TWO OF THEM <br />DEPENDING ON CONSTRUCTION COSTS. COUNCILMEMBER SCHEEL SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />4.10. Discussion on Policy for Storm Sewer Fees Related to the <br />Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer stated that staff is currently working on <br />developing a storm water utility fee which will generate money to be <br />utilized for storm sewer improvements by providing for a monthly or <br />quarterly charge. Terry Maurer stated that the only other funding <br />mechanism available for these types of improvements would be <br />assessments to the benefitted properties. Terry Maurer indicated that <br />the City Council should consider the appropriateness of a potential <br />assessment fee on an area basis for developing properties. The Council <br />should also determine at what level the rates should be set. After <br />further discussion it was the consensus of the Council to authorize the <br />City Engineer to research other cities and developments and bring a <br />recommendation back to the City Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Duitsman <br />informing them <br />assessments. <br /> <br />requested staff to send a memo to Elk River Utilities <br />of the possibility of billing for storm sewer <br /> <br />4.11. Update on Deerfield III Storm Sewer Project <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer stated that the City received a total of six <br />bids for the storm sewer improvement in the Deerfield III Addition. <br />The lowest bid was from D.B. Miller Inc., at $122,307. <br />