My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9.1. SR 11-20-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2017
>
11-20-2017
>
9.1. SR 11-20-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2017 3:47:51 PM
Creation date
11/16/2017 3:39:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/20/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11/13/2017 Are Food Trucks Good or Bad for the Twin Cities? | streets.mn <br />https://streets.mn/2012/07/09/are-food-trucks-good-or-bad-for-the-twin-cities/2/14 <br />Street vendors in Los Angeles. <br />A food truck parked by the Fulton Brewery, which until recently, was outside the “designated <br />food truck zone.” <br />The Long-Running Battle Between <br />Street Vendors and Shop Owners <br />This kind of debate is nothing new. As this <br />wonderful hitstory of sidewalk debates points <br />out, attempts to restrict street vending go <br />waaaaay back into history. For example, in <br />1691, New York City (New Amsterdam?) <br />prohibited selling on the streets until two <br />hours after the official markets opened. After <br />street vending blew up following the 19th <br />century explosion of US cities, a whole new <br />series of ordinances and regulations emerged <br />to try and control the practice. The history of <br />LA’s attempts to control push cart and <br />sidewalk fruit vendors reads like a Tolstoy novel, replete with strikes and fees and police crackdowns <br />and backroom deals and precise legal definitions of “fowl.” A more recent example is New York’s <br />policing of book and magazine vendors, which was part of that city’s semi-fascist Giuliani-fueled <br />crackdown on “quality of life” crimes. <br />The basic debate is not just about taxes and the maintaining buildings. There’s also a struggle over how <br />sidewalks and public spaces should be used. Is the sidewalk primarily a space for social interaction, for <br />eating and drinking and selling and buying and stopping and talking and sitting and sleeping and <br />protest? Or is the sidewalk a space to move through, a means of transportation? <br />Throughout most of the 20th century, our society has opted for Door #2. Almost all cities have <br />ordinances on the books that reserve the sidewalk for foot traffic, as means for getting from A to B. For <br />example, Minneapolis Code 427.110 says:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.