Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Special City Council Meeting <br />August 30, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Appropriations Summary page, the 1995 Personal Services Cost page, the <br />1995 Personal Service Additions page, and the 1995 Capital Outlay page that <br />were distributed at the 8/29 meeting were discussed. It was noted that with the <br />$80,000 addition in Personal Services for 1995, the budget gap is $339,000, and <br />that expenditures are higher than the 14.2 percent increase that was originally <br />presented. With this addition, expenditures would increase $564.450 or 16.6 <br />percent and the total would be $3,959,200. <br /> <br />The City Administrator reviewed with the City Council the Special Levy and <br />Supplemental budgets. The following items were noted: <br /> <br />Library - This budget is proposed to increase $5,900. Most of the increases <br />are related to additional building expenses associated with the expansion <br />project, the capital outlay expenditures for shelving, and the annual <br />budget share of the debt payment. <br /> <br />Equipment Certificates - The Police and Emergency Preparedness siren <br />expenses are consistent with past budgets. The Street Department <br />request is for approximately one-half of the cost for a new loader. The <br />remaining expenses for the loader would come from the street equipment <br />reserve and from monies generated by the sale of some City property to <br />the UPA. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Special Assessments - An increase was noted in the Meadowvale Park <br />special assessments. If no new special assessments are assumed by the <br />City, then this total levy will decrease in the next few years. <br /> <br />Sanitary Landfill - This budget is not financed by tax monies. The total is <br />estimated at the same amount as the adopted 1994 budget. Funds have <br />been shifted to allow for more professional services. Funds still are <br />included as a transfer to the general fund for City services. <br /> <br />HRA - Each line item and the budgeting process for the HRA were <br />reviewed. <br /> <br />EDA - It was noted that the total amount would not change even if the <br />EDA included some of the expenditures requested by the City Council. <br />The funding for these expenses would have to come from the <br />development activities line item and if more monies were needed for <br />development activities, then the EDA would have to use its fund balance. <br /> <br />The City Administrator distributed the 1994 Revenues or Source of Funds page. <br />The following comments were noted: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />General property tax - This category is proposed to increase $225,000 or 15 <br />percent based on an estimate of the needed revenues to finance City <br />operations with a minimum tax rate increase based on an assumed <br />increase in the City net tax capacity. The Council can increase or <br />decrease this amount prior to the 9115 certification date, but can only <br />decrease this amount after that time. <br />