Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />January 3], ] 994 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />square foot retail office facility to be located on the EDA Main Street <br />redevelopment site. Bill reviewed the background of the request which storted <br />with a public hearing on November 15, 1993. <br /> <br />Bill Rubin reviewed the history of the site. The site has been vacant since a fire <br />which destroyed existing buildings six years ago. Efforts to redevelop the site were <br />done in vain. The property was then acquired in 1991 for $109,000 by the City <br />and title conveyed to the EDA. TIF plans 1 and 3 were amended to reflect the <br />budgetary expense of acquiring the property. <br /> <br />Bill Rubin stated that at the present time, the developers ore requesting $235,000 <br />in TIF assistance; $165,000 for site preparation and $70,000 for land acquisition. <br /> <br />Chris Bulow, agent for the developer for the project, indicated that this project <br />was started one yeor ago. The project is a feasible project. Mr. Bulow stated that <br />the downtown corporation and the Chamber of Commerce met to discuss this <br />project. No negative comments from either group were heord regording the <br />project. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Gary Santwire, consultant for the developer, stated that the site as it is, is <br />unacceptable. Mr. Santwire stated that the project, if developed as proposed, <br />will produce a building valued at $625,000 which will pay real estate taxes and <br />will provide $70,000 to pay back funds the City originally spent to purchase the <br />property. If the property becomes a park, approximately $50,000 will be <br />necessary to make the improvements. This $50,000 along with the $70,000 the <br />City will lose from the Kjellberg development will total $120,000 that the City will <br />lose. <br /> <br />Council member Holmgren spoke regording the size of the project and the fact <br />that the building is the maximum size the project can support. He also discussed <br />the issue of the developer moving the project along with the impression that the <br />project would be approved. He stated that the fact that the Council changed <br />direction toword the end of the project was unfair to the developer. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO APPROVE THE TIF PLAN FOR TIF DISTRICT <br />NO. 12. COUNCILMEMBER SCHEEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION FAILED 2- <br />3. MA VOR DUITSMAN AND COUNCILMEMBERS DIETZ AND FARBER VOTED AGAINST <br />THE MOTION. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO DIRECT BILL RUBIN AND THE EDA TO <br />CONTINUE TO MARKET THE SITE OR TO SELL THE SITE OUTRIGHT TO A DEVELOPER. <br />COUNCILMEMBER FARBER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />5.7. Consider Altemate meetinq dates for City Council and Sherburne County Boord <br />ioint meetina <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council to hold a joint meeting with the Sherburne <br />County Board on Morch 7, 1994. This is a regularly scheduled Council meeting. <br /> <br />e <br />