My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-2017 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
10-02-2017 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:01:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2017 10:01:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
10/2/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />October 2, 2017 <br />Page 10 <br />Councilmember Westgaard — there was a firm that came in to help Marshall, Fargo, <br />and Bismarck to assist in fundraising and grants, which in tum is less money put on <br />the taxpayers. <br />Mayor Dietz stated he had a discussion with Sherburne County Commissioner Tim <br />Dolan regarding purchasing some land in the county and construct an arena that <br />could service the communities of Becker, Big Lake, and Elk River by utilizing a joint <br />powers agreement, although he was given some advice by someone to be leery of <br />such agreements. Mayor Dietz has reached out to the mayor of Big Lake to discuss <br />further interest. He also felt that the school district was one of the main users of the <br />arena and didn't feel they paid their fair share and received more benefits than what <br />they pay for. <br />Councilmember Westgaard indicated city programming actually uses the arena for <br />more hours than the school district. <br />Councilmember Wagner stated the perception is that youth hockey uses the ice more <br />but it's not all about youth hockey. She stated she also doesn't like kicking the can <br />down the road and doesn't like getting this information Friday and Monday they <br />have to make a decision and wonders if the Council is on the same page. She said it <br />would help her to have a better understanding of where the money is coming from <br />to explain to the taxpayers how's it's going to be paid for. <br />Mr. Pormer stated he doesn't have a magic bullet for this, which is why it's presented <br />as a levy, noting perhaps there're other funding options available. He stated the <br />proposed number is the best information he has to date, noting the timing of this <br />was set in motion a while ago. He indicated this decision was important knowing if <br />the Council waits, additional funds will be necessary to continue fixes and repairs. He <br />showed the Council the marketing information piece distributed during the <br />referendum that outlined the city's need for a solution regardless of the referendum <br />outcome, noting each outcome has a taxpayer cost. <br />Councilmember Ovall's stated his concerns with property tax creep and outlined <br />upcoming burdens and needs versus the cost of the want of the arena. He also asked <br />about making this work on the current parcel of property. He is opposed to the local <br />option sales tax. <br />Mr. Portner explained the current setting of the arena and land swap with the arena <br />as well as the task force review the limited land the city currently owned and in many <br />ways, this location is the next best option. He discussed other cities and how they <br />pay for their projects by use of an EDA levy and fundraising campaigns. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated if the school district will have amenities in this <br />facility, they should be vetted out and discussed. <br />Councilmember Olsen agreed with Councilmember Westgaard and indicated the <br />current arena status is a disaster waiting to happen. <br />PRREREO RI <br />NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.