Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elk River City Council Minutes <br />June 19, 1995 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />THE DEVELOPER PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT <br />REQUIRED BY THE CITY TO COVER THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. <br /> <br />15. UPON COMPLETING ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVING THEM <br />ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, A WARRANTY BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF 25% OF THE <br />IMPROVEMENT COSTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CITY FOR A ONE YEAR <br />PERIOD. <br /> <br />16. SIDEWALKS BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO EXHIBIT C INCLUDED IN THE STAFF <br />REPORT DATED JUNE 19, 1995. <br /> <br />17. AN EASEMENT FOR TRAIL ACCESS BE PROVIDED ON A PORTION OF THE <br />NORTHEAST T-SHAPED CUL-DE-SACS TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED <br />PARK IN OUTLOT A. <br /> <br />18. A COMPLETE AMENITY PACKAGE BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. <br />THIS INFORMATION SHALL ADDRESS THE ENTRANCES AT BOTH PROCTOR AND <br />COUNTY ROAD 1, AS WELL AS LANDSCAPING AND OTHER FEATURES <br />PROPOSED FOR THE PLAT. <br /> <br />19. THE RECOMMENDATIONS BY TIM EDGETON OF THE SHERBURNE COUNTY TREE <br />BOARD BE INCORPORATED IN THE REVISED PLANS, AS STATED IN HIS LETTER <br />TO THE CITY PLANNER, STEVE ACH. <br /> <br />20. <br /> <br />THE STATUS OF OUTLOTS C AND D AT THE PROCTOR AVENUE ENTRANCE BE <br />RESEARCHED TO DETERMINE THE BEST SOLUTION TO ACCOMMODATE THE <br />CITY'S AND THE DEVELOPER'S BEST INTERESTS TO ESTABLISH A LANDSCAPED <br />ENTRANCE. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />21. DEVELOPER BE RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND PROVIDING THE <br />APPROPRIATE (CLASS 5) BASE WITHIN EACH OF THE TRAIL CORRIDORS <br />EXTENDING FROM THE DEVELOPMENT TO EITHER THE CITY TRAIL OR TO <br />OUTLOT A. <br /> <br />22. ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING BE PROVIDED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY <br />LINES OF THOSE LOTS ADJACENT TO 193RD AVENUE. <br /> <br />23. PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, AN AGREED UPON CASH PAYMENT FOR <br />PARK DEDICATION BE RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. <br /> <br />24. A REVIEW OF THE POSSIBLE NEED FOR A SECURITY FENCE BETWEEN THE <br />PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND RIDGEWOOD SUBDIVISION. THE <br />DETERMINATION OF WHETHER A SECURITY FENCE IS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE <br />BY THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. <br /> <br />MAYOR DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />7.14. <br /> <br />City of Elk River Reauest for Ordinance Amendment. Zero Lot Development. <br />Public Hearina. Case No. OA 95-03 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Planning Assistant Gary Schmitz indicated that the City of Elk River is requesting to <br />amend various sections of the City Code related to zero lot line developments. <br />Gary noted that the city is requesting that zero lot developments be allowed as a <br />