Laserfiche WebLink
1�Hakanson <br />111Anderson <br />August 29, 2017 <br />Justin Femrite, City Engineer <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />RE: 2017 Street Improvements <br />Dear Mr. Femrite: <br />Main Office: <br />3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 <br />Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 <br />www.haa-inc.com r <br />SENT VIA EMAIL: JFemrite(cr�,ElkRiverMN.gov <br />We are pleased to continue to provide quality engineering, construction observation and construction staking <br />services related to the 2017 Street Improvement Project for the City of Elk River. As discussed verbally, there <br />have been a few items that have increased in scope making it necessary to request this consideration for an <br />increase in the maximum not -to -exceed cost of our services. <br />The most significant change to the scope of this project is the construction timeframe and resulting costs of <br />construction observation and construction administration. At the time of our proposal, it was estimated that the <br />construction timeframe would be 16 weeks total. We are now entering week 20 of construction and the project <br />is projected to take approximately 5 additional weeks, for a total construction timeframe of 25 weeks. There <br />were other smaller adjustments in scope as well, discussed in greater detail by project area as follows: <br />Business Center Drive / Joplin Street / Orono Parkway Project Area <br />At the time of our proposal, the construction method of this area was assumed to be a full depth reclamation <br />and re -paving project with some curb replacement. Construction was anticipated to have a relatively quick <br />timeframe (4 weeks). The construction process involved replacing the failed curb and gutter, removing the <br />excess full depth reclamation material, and re -paving the bituminous courses. <br />Instead, this project area increased in scope to a partial reconstruction. During the design phase, it was <br />determined that the existing thickness of the pavement and aggregate base was not sufficient to meet pavement <br />design thicknesses as required by Mn/DOT design standards based on the projected traffic over the next 20 <br />years. Therefore, after reclaiming the bituminous pavement it was necessary to remove the entire thickness (9" <br />- 10") of full depth reclamation material, then subcut the existing subgrade (4"- 6") then replace the full depth <br />reclamation material to prepare for the bituminous pavement. This construction process increased the <br />construction timeframe by approximately 6 weeks and slightly increased the design effort. It is estimated that <br />this change in scope resulted in an increase in cost of approximately $32,000. <br />At the time of the proposal reclaiming and paving of the bituminous trail on Joplin Street and Orono Parkway <br />was not anticipated. While we agree that it was logical to include the trails in the project, the addition slightly <br />increased the design effort as well as the construction timeframe. It is estimated that the addition of the trail <br />resulted in an increase in cost of approximately $4,500. <br />At the time of the proposal, drainage improvements were not anticipated on Orono Parkway. However, during <br />the design phase it was discovered that improvements could be made to improve the safety and ride. Storm <br />sewer was added at strategic locations which slightly increased the design effort as well as the construction <br />timeframe. It is estimated that the addition of the drainage improvements resulted in an increase in cost of <br />approximately $6,500. <br />