Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Memo to City Council/ZC 99-8 <br />October 25, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />when the clinic would have limited hours. The frontage road is designed to <br />accommodate an increase in the amount of traffic from commercial development. <br /> <br />Planninq Commission Action <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the request to <br />the City Council. The Commission felt that the C-4, Neighborhood Commercial District <br />was more sensitive to the adjacent residential districts and uses, especially the <br />Guardian Angels project. They expressed surprise that medical and dental clinics were <br />not a use in the Neighborhood Commercial District and would support an amendment to <br />the C-4 District to allow those uses. To preserve the intent of low impact uses on the <br />adjacent residential properties, an ordinance amendment may need to include a size <br />limit for medical clinics (for example, the Fairview Clinic is 24,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The parcel could be zoned either Neighborhood or Highway Commercial, the City <br />Council needs to determine what district is appropriate at this location. The <br />Comprehensive Plan (page 23) indicates a City desire to orient commercial activity on <br />West Highway 10 towards neighborhood or community scale. If the City Council <br />approves the zone change, the following findings are noted: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />THAT THE PROPERTY IS BETTER SUITED FOR HIGHWAY <br />COMMERCIAL USES. <br /> <br />2. THAT THE REZONING WILL NOT CREATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO <br />ADJACENT USES. <br /> <br />If the zone change is approved, it would be more consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan if the underlying land use were changed to Highway Business and staff <br />recommends that the applicant submit a request to do so if the zone change is <br />approved. <br /> <br />If the City Council denies the zone change, the following findings are noted: <br /> <br />1. THE REZONING IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. <br /> <br />2. THE ZONE CHANGE WOULD HAVE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT <br />PROPERTIES. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ORIENTING COMMERCIAL USES TO THE <br />NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY SCALE ALONG WEST HIGHWAY <br />10. <br />