Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 10 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 25 <br /> <br />such as Wal-Mart, with perhaps 200,000 plus square feet were to be constructed one-half mile away, <br />soon, the auto traffic in the older mall lessened. The Target or Kmart with only 45,000 sq. feet closed <br />and surrendered. The anchor store then remained vacant and the decline of the mall accelerated. <br />Throughout the United States, formerly prosperous malls or strip centers have given up. The areas <br />have become desolate and look abandoned and the customers depart for the newest supercenters and <br />their parking areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Potential Negative Impact Considering the Multiplier Effect on a Regional Economy <br /> <br />Previously mentioned and described in this study is the new phenomena of the "Power Center" which <br />has been gaining momentum in the mid 1990's. The Power Centers have been described as "Big Box" <br />farms where there are a half-dozen or more mega-stores and smaller superstores set around vast <br />(upwards of 1200 spaces) parking lots with total retailing space nearing one-half million square feet. <br /> <br />The effect of the centers multiplies that of the single mega- or super-store. These stores and centers <br />draw customers from a radius of 10 - to 15- miles in major metropolitan areas and even larger areas <br />in rural ones. By increasing their drawing range, these mega-retail discount chains are also increasing <br />their negative impact on "Main Street" retailers as well as the smaller retail discount chains that <br />during the past year have been plummeting into bankruptcy or dissolution. <br /> <br />In California, we have begun to see another approach. Wal-Mart, who has received opposition in <br />some communities to building new stmctures has begun to renovate empty mall department stores or <br />attach their new buildings to an existing mall. They are easily able to accomplish this since the <br />community infrastructure is already in place - parking, roadways, water, and sewers. Their economic <br />argument is that they will enhance the traffic to the mall; hence increasing overall business and the <br />local GDP. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />But how is this constructive result possible when Wal-Mart provides direct competition to at least <br />50% of the small businesses already in the mall. Look at the example of the Huntington Beach mall <br />(stores listed below in Table 15) where there are 31 relatively small stores in addition to three largec. <br />ones (anchors). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ISpencer Gifts <br />IGreat Earth <br />IONC <br />ISee's Candy <br />IDiamond Jewelers <br />IKayBee Toys <br />IRegis Hairstyle <br />IHallmark <br />IAthletic Press <br />IShoe Witz <br />ISizes Unlimited <br /> <br />Table 15 <br />Huntington Beach Mall <br />IIWet Seal IIMusicland <br />IILechters IISunglass Hut <br />liMon Ami IIClaires I <br />,IBurlington Coat Factory IIHudson Goodman Jewele~ <br />IILearhers Cloth IIKinney Shoes I <br />IIWalden Books IIGTE-Phones I <br />IILane Bryant IIRadio Shack I <br />IIWard's Department StorellSilver Lace I <br />IIAshley Jewelers IIIntrigue I <br />IIPost Office IIExpress Emporium I <br />IIGeneral Store IIMervyn's Department Storel <br /> <br />http://www.shilsreport.org/chap 1 O.html <br /> <br />10/6/99 <br />