Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />October 18, 1999 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />DIRECTING ITS EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR ITS PAYMENT. <br />COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />4.3. <br /> <br />Consider Calling Administrative Hearina for Liauor Violation <br /> <br />Police Chief Tom Zerwas stated that in recent liquor license compliance check, <br />only one Elk River establishment sold alcohol to a minor. He explained that since <br />grant monies were used to conduct the "sting" operation, the city must take <br />action against the violator or it will be done by the state. Chief Zerwas stated <br />that since the city has not taken action against violations in the past, other than a <br />reprimand, he felt it would not be fair to impose a harsh penalty on the violator. <br />He requested that the City Council set an administrative hearing for November 8 <br />and serve the violator notice of the hearing. Chief Zerwas also asked that the <br />City Council consider the draft resolution attached to the staff report regarding <br />sanctions for future liquor law violations. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON MOVED TO CALL AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FOR <br />THE LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION ON NOVEMBER 8,1999, AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO <br />SERVE DADDY O'S NOTICE OF THIS HEARING. COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN SECONDED <br />THE MOTION. THE MOTION 4-0. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Council and staff discussed the penalties proposed in the draft resolution. <br />Council member Motin stated his support for strong penalties. Councilmember <br />Dietz felt that the first violation should carry a $500 fine, the second violation <br />$1,000, and revocation of the liquor license for the third violation. Mayor Klinzing, <br />Councilmembers Motin and Thompson concurred. <br /> <br />Council member Motin asked if the revocation would be permanent. City <br />Administrator Pat Klaers stated he was unsure and would have the City Clerk <br />research this question, but that he thought the applicant would have an <br />opportunity to reapply after a given time period. <br /> <br />The Council was in agreement to consider the resolution at a future meeting. <br /> <br />4.4. <br /> <br />Discussion on Huntina Restrictions and Ordinance <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Chief Zerwas stated that a request was received to allow hunting around Pintail <br />Ponds, which is owned by Riverside Development, and the Larry and Carol Turner <br />property north of Pintail Ponds. He explained that even though the property is <br />zoned R1 e, hunting has been allowed by the City Council, due to the fact the <br />area is largely undeveloped and no homes have been constructed in Trott Brook <br />at this time. Chief Zerwas stated that, if directed by the City Council, he would <br />be comfortable to allow hunting this year in the area shown in "yellow" on the <br />map attached to his memo dated October 14,1999. He asked the council to <br />also consider directing the Park and Recreation Commission to evaluate the <br />existing hunting ordinance. He felt there may be areas in which hunting could be <br />allowed by special permit to control deer and wild game populations. Chief <br />Zerwas stated that there may also be areas in which hunting is not allowed but <br />may be suitable for bow hunting. He felt that if the city does not take steps to <br />prevent deer overpopulation now, the end result will be increased deer/motor <br />vehicle accidents. <br />