7.7. SR 09-18-2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Staff reminded the Parks and Recreation Commission recommendations need to be made based on what the current plan shows. This was discussed in detail at the December 19, 2016, City Council meeting when they re-reviewed the plat of Whiteoak. The City Council indicated the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is side specific and staff/the city need to make recommendations and decisions based on these approved plans. As a result of the December 19, 2016, City Council meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission was tasked with updating the trail master plan to be more definitive and not just conceptual. The Parks and Recreation Commission is currently completing this task. Applicable Regulation Approval of a plat may only be ordered if the following findings are made, as outlined in Section 30-375: 7. The proposed subdivision is consistent Pith the honing regulations (article VI of this chaptev� and conforms in all respects Pith all requirements of this Code, including the honing regulations and this article. The property is zoned R1-a (residential) and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning regulations outlined in the city code and approved plans. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent Pith all applicable general and specialised city, county, and regional plans, including but not limited to, the city's comprehensive developmentplan. The proposed subdivision does not conflict with any city, county, or regional plans,including the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development and uses contemplated. The site is suitable for the existing and proposed residential structures. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for Pater supply, storm drainage, sen)age transportation, erosion control and all other services,facilities and improvements other�a ise required in this article. The subdivision has adequate provision for all required facilities. 5. The proposed subdivision Pill not cause substantial environmental damage. The proposal will not cause substantial environmental damage. 6. The proposed subdivision Pill not conflict Pith easements of record or Pith easements established by judgment of a court. It will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of a court. 7. The proposed subdivision Pill not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. The proposed subdivision will be executed to improve the development potential of neighboring land and will not have an undue and adverse impact. 8. Theproposed subdivision is notpremature.A subdivision ispremature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate stormn)ater drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sen)er systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. All of the above services or improvements will be connected or constructed as part of the development.