My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2 PCSR 08-21-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
08-22-2017
>
4.2 PCSR 08-21-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2017 4:45:25 PM
Creation date
8/17/2017 2:29:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
9/21/2012
case
P 17-15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was a conservative estimate to ensure all possible wetlands are protected. The applicant may qualify <br /> for energy efficiency rebates for use of LED bulbs and energy efficient items. No other concerns or <br /> issues with the application as proposed. <br /> 6. Case # OA 17-09—City of Elk River Ordinance Amendment <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. <br /> 7. Case# P 17-16—City of Elk River Simple Plat—Outlot B, Parkview Addition <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Project site has wetlands <br /> present,delineation would be required before any work can be done. <br /> 8. Case # SP 17-02—Aegir Brewing Company <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. <br /> 9. Case# P 17-15—CM Points Holding—Hillside 11th Addition <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Wetlands present on site but <br /> delineated boundary shown on plans.Wetland delineations and WCA Decisions are only valid for <br /> five years. <br /> 10. Case # OA 17-10, CU 17-20—Satellite Shelters Ordinance Amendment& CUP <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. Project site has wetlands <br /> present,delineation would be required before any work can be done on site. <br /> 11. Case # CU 17-21—Casey's General Store <br /> 1. This site is located within the Wild and Scenic River District which limits impervious <br /> surface to 25% and has strict design criteria to visual conceal structures from the river view, set forth <br /> by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. DNR Area Hydrologist for Sherburne County <br /> discussed this site with staff and agreed that the development could occur and meet the goals of the <br /> District,as long as visual concealment is maintained. Given there are other buildings between this <br /> site and the river,this requirement is less of a concern. Staff would still recommend including visual <br /> conditions within the variance. Staff would also recommend the property owner be required to treat <br /> all stormwater on site to ensure the proposed increase in impervious surface does not negatively <br /> impact site stormwater management overall. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.