Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2000 Budget <br />July 21, 1999 <br />Faile 5 <br /> <br />. revenue in 2000, but we would also reduce the police department expenditure <br />budget by $28,000 for personal services for this C80. Accordingly, by not <br />accepting this grant, we will have a positive impact of $20,000 on the 2000 <br />budget. <br /> <br />As you can tell, the intergovernmental revenues category has a lot of shifting <br />of funds depending on the availability of grants, penalties for TIF Districts, <br />and new programs either being created or eliminated by the state. <br /> <br />Charees for Services <br /> <br />Overp.ll, this category is projected to increase $11,950 or 2.7 percent to a total <br />of $4~,450. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Only three line items have changed in this budget category. The biggest <br />change is that plan check fees have increased by $39,950 to a total of <br />$167,700. This is a 31.3 percent increase over the adopted 1999 budget. (In <br />the 1999 budget, this line item increased by $15,000, and in 1998 this line <br />item increased by $21,750.) Plan check fees are based on a percentage of the <br />building permit (approximately 60 percent). This 2000 increase is significant <br />and, truthfully, is more than I am comfortable with, but is based on recent <br />actual revenues. Historically, staff has been conservative in projecting plan <br />check fee revenues (and building permit fee revenues) in order to not become <br />dependent on this revenue source in case the economy goes bad and in order <br />to have some revenues available at the end of the year to add to the cash flow <br />reserves per the recommendation from the auditor... this increase in plan <br />check fees was unfortunately necessary in order to offset the loss of revenue <br />from the school liaison program. Forty-three thousand dollars is projected for <br />school liaison revenue in 2000 and this is a $27,000 reduction from the <br />adopted 1999 budget. This revenue amount was accepted by the City Council <br />a few months ago...the only other change in this category is a $1,000 <br />reduction in revenues generated by selling copies. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />For your information, the administrative project revenue is based on 21h <br />percent fee being charged on public improvement bonds that are issued by <br />the city. The 2000 revenue is based on part of the east Elk River trunk sewer <br />and water project. The revenues from this improvement project are being <br />split between the 1999,2000, and 2001 budgets...the fire calls and contracts <br />revenues are projected in the same amount as last year and this is a very <br />difficult revenue to predict. If revenues are higher, typically then expenses <br />are also higher for part time salaries for the firefighters...the recreation fees <br />are projected in the same amount as last year, but it should be noted that we <br />have never exceeded $60,000 in revenues from this program and it is <br />expected that the 1999 budget is a high estimate. We did receive $58,600 in <br />revenue in 1997, but this amount is the highest amount ever received from <br />this program. <br />