Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2000 Budget <br />July 21, 1999 <br />Pag-e 2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As in past years, the City Council will be looking at a "budget gap" between <br />estimated revenues and requested expenditures. Last year the initial budget <br />gap was in the $150-$200,000 range and, while the proposed expenditures <br />have yet to be finalized, it is estimated that a similar budget gap will need to <br />be closed in order to balance the 2000 budget. Most of the council decisions to <br />close the budget gap will relate to personal services (additional employees) <br />and, to a lesser degree, capital outlay items along with consideration on <br />continuing or expanding city programs and services. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Attached for your information is some budget notes in a chart form that may <br />provide some insight into the budget issues we need to address. The top row <br />comes from the annually approved budgets and the bottom row comes from <br />the finance department annual reports. The top row is offered to show the <br />relationships between budget increases, tax revenue increases, and increases <br />in expenses for personal services. (It should be noted that if the equipment <br />and library expenses were included in the general fund budget, the personal <br />services percent of the total budget would be between five and seven percent <br />lower for each year; but the trend of having personal services take up a larger <br />percentage of the overall city expenditures would be the same.) As this chart <br />indicates, a good share of the overall budget increase is financed with <br />additional tax revenues and, in many cases, almost all of the budget increase <br />is related to additional expenses for personal services. <br /> <br />The second row of the chart is offered to show the relationship between <br />growth in the city's NTC and this impact on the city's tax rate. When the city <br />experienced significant increases in its NTC (due mainly to business growth <br />along Highway 169), the tax rate remained stable while significant <br />additional tax revenues were generated. In this manner, the city "lived off its <br />growth" for providing additional services and programs. In the late 1990's, <br />legislative action was taken to compress the tax classes and the result was <br />that, in spite of significant growth in the city's overall market value, the <br />city's net tax capacity growth slowed down dramatically and actually <br />decreased in 1999. This had a big impact on our city tax rate when we <br />increased tax revenues, but is should be noted that the tax impact for the <br />homeowners and business owners was relatively modest due to additional <br />state legislative action to increase educational credits. Legislative action has <br />changed the city's tax base mix and has made homeowners responsible for a <br />higher percent of the total taxes paid to governmental units. <br /> <br />. <br />