Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />1.1.2. TRANSPORTA TION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />A second alternative to be considered when selecting the Locally Preferred Transportation <br />Investment Strategy (LPTIS) is the refinement of transportation management/bus improvements <br />referred to as the Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative. <br /> <br />The TSM Alternative provides a framework for strategies that provide lower cost improvement <br />of the existing transportation network and includes infrastructure improvements that will benefit <br />transit operations along with improvements in transit service coverage, span and connectivity; <br />and minor roadway improvements. <br /> <br />Based on the initial work in Phase I and recent meetings with representatives from Metro Transit, <br />Anoka County Transit, St. Cloud Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), MnlDOT District 3, <br />and the RiverRider Service, a number of strategies have been identified as part of the TSM <br />Alternative. These strategies are discussed in the following sections. <br /> <br />Bus Operations Strategies <br /> <br />Bus operations strategies address connectIvIty within the corridor and offer transportation <br />alternatives that build upon existing transit services and facilities. Bus operations strategies <br />include transit service enhancements, infrastructure improvements, additional park-and-ride lots <br />and the expansion of existing park-and-ride and transit facilities. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As part of the planning process for developing the TSM Alternative, transit providers within the <br />corridor met to identify ways to better integrate bus services throughout the corridor. As a result, <br />the following service parameters were developed: <br /> <br />· Express bus service would operate between Rice and downtown Minneapolis on a frequency <br />similar to the schedule identified in the Commuter Rail Feasibility Study, also known as <br />service Concept B. <br />· Park-and-ride facilities would be situated at locations previously identified as potential <br />station sites along the corridor with some location modifications. <br />· A variety of feeder bus services would provide local/neighborhood service to park-and-ride <br />facilities enabling passengers to transfer to/from express routes. <br /> <br />The express bus service concept developed under this TSM Alternative embraces many of the <br />characteristics of commuter rail, with the exception that the service is provided by buses. One <br />advantage with bus transportation is that it allows for greater flexibility in scheduling, allocating <br />resources and reacting to demand. <br /> <br />For planning purposes, service frequency and capacity information previously defined in the <br />Commuter Rail Feasibility Study was used as a maximum level of service under this alternative. <br />The capacity of each commuter train (three cars) is equivalent to eight full-size buses; therefore <br />the number of buses necessary to match this level of service will be significantly higher in most <br />. areas of the corridor. However, it is possible that ridership levels may be less than what was <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Phase II Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study <br />Draft - TSM Alternative <br /> <br />June 24, 1999 <br />