My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2017 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
06-19-2017 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2017 10:48:48 AM
Creation date
7/6/2017 10:48:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
6/19/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />June 19, 2017 <br />Page 6 <br />• The city should abandon the TIF District if the Council is not going to consider <br />moving the building. He expressed concerns with gambling on whether the <br />applicant will work with the city. <br />■ Could the city get a letter from the applicant stating they will continue to work <br />with the city in redeveloping the area? <br />• The city could end up spending tax payer money and get nothing out of the <br />project. <br />■ The road location is the county engineer's expert opinion. <br />• Concerns with duplication of storm water efforts and the applicant should be <br />aware he will be responsible for creating a storm water pond on his property. <br />Attorney Beck stated the best way for the applicant to work with the city is to extend <br />the time period on the applications. <br />Councilmember Westgaard noted the city doesn't have to build a storm water pond. <br />He stated if the applicant moves forward with his project, the city is still going to <br />want a transportation connection and the city could go back to its original plan to <br />acquire the three parcels for the connection. He stated there are all kinds of <br />alternatives to the Master Plan dependent upon what is decided. <br />Mr. Wisner stated if the applicant moves forward with their project, if approved <br />tonight, they would be required to install their own storm water treatment system on <br />their property. He stated they originally proposed a system underground of their <br />parking lot. He stated this is generally an expensive plan because it has to be <br />structurally sound. <br />Mayor Dietz stated there needs to be assurances on the city side. He questioned what <br />the city would be left with; hoping the applicant will cooperate and do the master <br />plan? <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated yes and hopes they will continue to work with the <br />city on what is the highest and best use for this whole redevelopment area. He <br />questioned staff about what is magical about having 30 more days versus the <br />previous 120 already taken. He noted Council is always in a situation where they <br />have to pick and choose, and from a policy standpoint, it makes the decisions more <br />difficult for them. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated we are not at the end of a process, but rather in the middle of a <br />planning process in following our plans. He noted the city has already spent <br />thousands of dollars on the project. He stated sometimes it is easier to react to <br />situations versus planning ahead for them. He stated we don't want to react to a <br />specific application but more to the bigger picture and what will be better for the <br />whole city. <br />Attorney Beck stated the biggest issue at the current time is acquiring the properties. <br />POA'EAEI IY <br />NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.