Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J Del Larson Request <br />March 7, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />the parcel should be included in the Urban Service Area, but when. Sewer and water is <br />located in 17Sth Avenue and is available to this property. The subject property is towards the <br />east end of an 80 acre area that is surrounded on three sides by properties that are within the <br />Urban Service Area. <br /> <br />Issues <br /> <br />. Timing - is it appropriate to include this parcel in the Urban Service Area at this <br />time? <br /> <br />The property is of sufficient size that it could be developed on its own without adversely <br />impacting the future development of adjacent parcels. Including it in the Urban Service Area <br />would be consistent with the land use designation of High Density Residential. Therefore, it <br />would be appropriate to include this property in the Urban Service Area at this time. <br /> <br />. Is it appropriate to expand the proposed amendment to include additional lots on <br />the south side of 17 Sth or is it fine to do it lot by lot? <br /> <br />This issue has been raised because the argument has been made that by including all the <br />properties south of 17Sth in the Urban Service Area the city would be a position to review a <br />unified development plan for the entire area. This is a valid issue and should be considered <br />independently from this proposal. <br /> <br />Rezoning <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting a rezoning to R3. The R3 zoning district allows a density up to 8 <br />units per acre and sets specific lot layout requirements and design and material standards for <br />the townhouse units. The High Density Residential land use, when adjacent to lower density <br />neighborhoods, allows for lower density development such as townhomes. The proposed R3 <br />zoning would meet this criterion. There are larger residential lots directly north of this site <br />and to the northeast is Park Point, which is a residential development platted at the R1 c <br />density. The proposed zoning would allow for a transition from potential higher density <br />residential on the west to the lower density residential to the east and north. <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br />. Should the zoning be R4 to allow for higher density given the land use designation is <br />High Density Residential? <br /> <br />The R4 zoning district, which allows up to about 11 or 12 units per acre, would be more <br />consistent with the High Density Residential density of 8 to 20 units per acre. However, <br />given the proximity of single family residences to the north and northeast, the R3 density, <br />which allows only up to 8 units per acre, is more appropriate. Development at R3 density <br />would act as a buffer between the single family residences and future higher density <br />development to the west. <br /> <br />S:\pLANNING\Case Files\2004\LU 04-06 Larson\LU04-06CC03-07.doc <br />