Laserfiche WebLink
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br />SPRINGSTED Page 6 <br /> <br />The proposed project consists of the redevelopment of property within the City that consists of blighted <br />properties that were found to be substandard and will be demolished following establishment of the district. <br />The City has identified significant and extraordinary costs including public improvements, acquisition and <br />demolition associated with redevelopment of the project site in conjunction with new development. The <br />estimated total redevelopment costs for this property make the total cost of this effort significantly higher than <br />costs reasonably incurred for similar developments on a clean site. The City’s finding that the proposed <br />redevelopment would be unlikely to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable <br />future is based on an analysis of the proforma and other materials submitted by the developer. As necessary, the <br />City anticipates analyzing future developer’s proformas in detail to determine the minimal amount of assistance <br />needed to compensate developers for extraordinary and allowable costs. <br /> <br />No higher market value expected: <br /> <br />If the proposed redevelopment did not go forward, for the same reasons described above, no significant <br />alternative redevelopment of the proposed TIF area would occur. The existing buildings are currently <br />substandard and it is highly unlikely that the improvements would be made on the property site without tax <br />increment financing. In short, there is no basis for expectation that the area would redevelop or be renovated in <br />any significant way purely by private action without public subsidy. <br /> <br />To summarize the basis for the City’s findings regarding alternative market value, in accordance with Minnesota <br />Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3(d), the City makes the following determinations: <br /> <br />a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without <br />the use of tax increment financing is anywhere from $0 to some modest amount based on small scale <br />renovation or redevelopment that could be possible without assistance; any estimated values would be <br />too speculative to ascertain. <br /> <br />b. If the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District, the total <br />increase in market value would be approximately $2,829,727, including the value of the building (See <br />Exhibit V). <br /> <br />c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district <br />permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $731,388 (See Exhibit V). <br /> <br />d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council <br />finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than <br />$2,098,339 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. <br /> <br /> (3) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a <br />whole, for development of the Project Area by private enterprise. <br /> <br />Factual basis: <br /> <br />The anticipated redevelopment of the project site and any subsequent demolition, reconstruction, or renovation <br />related to the project will remain consistent with the City’s design goals. <br /> <br /> (4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole. <br /> <br />Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF Plan <br />conforms to the City comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />