My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4. SR 06-21-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
06/21/1999
>
6.4. SR 06-21-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:18 AM
Creation date
3/2/2005 3:24:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to the City Council/LU 99-1 <br />June 21, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />manage growth, protect the long range perspective of the city, and protect the <br />best employment and tax base opportunities of such property. <br /> <br />On June 17, 1996, the City Council considered an ordinance amendment <br />which would allow commercial and industrial development within the city's <br />urban service district prior to the availability sewer and water. The <br />amendment was in response to a request from LeFebvre and Morrell trucking <br />operations to relocate onto 171st Avenue NW. At that time, the City Planner <br />suggested a PUD approach, rather than an ordinance, to allow this <br />development with the stipulation that the developers waive their rights to <br />future assessments and guarantee hook up to sewer and water when it is <br />available. The ordinance amendment was denied and the PUD approach was <br />used. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In this case the issues are similar. The applicant believes that he has waited <br />long enough for sewer and water and would like to develop the property at <br />this time. Presently, the applicant is proposing to develop mini-storage on <br />one parcel and place a billboard on the other. Staff has maintained that the <br />applicant has always had the option to request the removal of his property <br />from the urban service district. Staff, however, would not necessarily support <br />a return to the urban service district at a later date. Development without <br />sewer and water generally results in a lower tax base and fewer employees, <br />contrary to two goals of the Economic Strategic Plan. Also, it is unlikely that <br />a mini-storage facility would be removed or demolished for redevelopment <br />once urban services are available. Removing this site from the urban service <br />district may result in a utility extension that will be designed accordingly <br />and lower expenses for the city. <br /> <br />This site is unique and might warrant removal from the sewer and water <br />district. The site has no access to Waco Street and will need access from <br />Highway 10 or through Big Lake Township. There is a large wetland to the <br />south of the site making both access and sewer extension difficult from the <br />south. Easements for sewer and water would need to be acquired south of <br />the site to provide sewer and water (See attached, Howard R. Green <br />memorandum). <br /> <br />The City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan states: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />All future development within the boundaries of the planned urban <br />service district will require hookup to municipal water and sanitary <br />sewer systems except for the residential area between the Elk River, <br />County Road 35, Meadowvale Road and the western boundary of the City <br />which will require overlay plats for future development. <br /> <br />\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\stevewen \ccmmo \lu99-I.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.