Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />May 17,1999 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />6.6. <br /> <br />Request bv Mel Beaudrv for Setback Variance, Public Hearina Case No. V 99-6 <br /> <br />Staff report by Steve Wensman. Mel Beaudry has requested a 15 foot front yard <br />setback variance in order to build a home closer to the street where the grade is <br />at a higher elevation. Mr. Beaudry feels that placing the home at the 50 foot <br />setback will require constructing a more expensive home and septic system. Staff <br />recommends denial of the request based on the fact the applicant does not <br />meet 3 of the 5 criteria necessary for granting a variance. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Dale Wagner, neighbor to Mr. Beaudry's property, expressed his support for the <br />variance. He stated he would like to see Mr. Beaudry's home placed at a similar <br />setback to his home. <br /> <br />Mel Beaudry, applicant, indicated that he disagrees with staff's <br />recommendations and feels that he should be allowed to follow the setbacks <br />that were in place when the other homes in this plat were constructed. He noted <br />that his lot is the last lot to be built on in the subdivision. Mr. Beaudry submitted a <br />letter from Jim Leuer Construction which states that it is not possible to fit a home <br />on this lot within the required setbacks, without placing the home on low land. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing asked staff if it would be possible to build within the setbacks. <br />Steve Wensman indicated he could not make that determination without seeing <br />the plans. <br /> <br />Councilmember Farber indicated he felt the house should be built in line with the <br />neighboring homes and did feel a hardship exists. <br /> <br />Councilmember Motin indicated he felt the situation was unique and met the <br />requirements for a variance. <br /> <br />There being no further public comment, Mayor Klinzing closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MAYOR KLINZING MOVED TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST BY MEL BEAUDRY, <br />PUBLIC HEARING CASE NO. V 99-6, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> <br />1. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WILL CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP. <br /> <br />2. THE HARDSHIP IS CAUSED BY SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES THAT <br />ARE PECULIAR TO THE PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURE INVOLVED AND WHICH <br />ARE NOT CHARACTERISTIC OF, OR APPLICABLE TO, OTHER LANDS OR STRUCTURE <br />IN THE SAME AREA. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3. THE LITERAL APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE WOULD <br />DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER OF RIGHTS ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME <br />DISTRICT UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE. THE HOME WILL COMPLY WITH <br />THE SETBACK STANDARD THAT WAS IN PLACE AT THE TIME THE LOT WAS PLATTED <br />AND THE STANDARDS HAVE SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN CHANGED. <br />