My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 05-10-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
05/10/1999
>
5.1. SR 05-10-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:16 AM
Creation date
2/28/2005 2:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/10/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of the receipt of the revenues are known at this time. The assumptions made <br />include tax increment revenues based on construction values and a build-out <br />schedule provided by the developer, green acre deferrals of $420,420, of which <br />$207,600 would be deferred seven years and $212,820 deferred 14 years, Trott <br />Brook special assessment prepayments based on a seven year build-out as <br />estimated by the developer, and timely payment of all special assessments. <br />Any changes in these assumptions will, of course, affect the revenue stream <br />available to meet debt service. The most important issue is that the <br />construction of the commercial properties within TIF District 19 remain on <br />schedule and at the values indicated by the developer. <br /> <br />Page 13 of the Recommendations indicates the property tax levy which will be <br />certified to the county auditor as a requirement of the bond issuance. Based on <br />preliminary estimates, a small portion (principal of approximately $145,000) <br />may be required to be financed through property tax levies if other sources do <br />not become available. This tax levy must be identified as a revenue source <br />because estimated deferrals in special assessment payments cause a cash flow <br />shortage. If sufficient revenues are available to meet debt service, the <br />property tax levies may be cancelled by the council on an annual basis. The <br />first scheduled levy is for collection in the year 2000. This levy will be <br />reviewed during the adoption of the levy resolution in September, 1999, to <br />determine if it can be canceled. <br /> <br />This is the largest public improvement bond that the city has issued. In the <br />past several years of working on this project, there have been numerous <br />discussions regarding the possibility of tax levies to meet debt service, the <br />bond issue size, and the city's credit rating. The credit rating applied to this <br />issue is very important as it affects the interest rate of the bonds. Moody's, the <br />city's bond rating agency, will be visiting Elk River on June 15 in anticipation <br />of rating this bond issue. At that time a Moody's representative will meet key <br />department heads, the city administrator, the mayor, and other elected <br />officials, after which she will take a tour of the city and the East Elk River <br />development area. This tour is intended to give Moody's an idea of the level of <br />growth in the city, how the growth has been handled, and the city's plans to <br />accommodate future growth. In addition to this on site visit, we will be <br />holding a teleconference with Moody's to provide additional data on the city, <br />its financial condition, and detailed background information on this project. <br />As you know, when Moody's reviews a credit rating, the total debt burden <br />placed on the taxpayers, including city, county and school district debt, is <br />considered. Because of this area's rapid growth there is considerable school <br />debt with anticipation of additional school debt in the near future. The city <br />also has slightly above average debt; however, most of it is special assessment <br />and revenue debt. The city does not have much tax supported debt. The <br />strong possibility of future city debt to facilitate infrastructure improvements <br />necessary for growth will also be a rating consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.