Laserfiche WebLink
E lls <br />River` <br />Request for Action <br />To <br />Item Number <br />Planning Commission <br />5.3 <br />Agenda Section <br />Meeting Date <br />Prepared by <br />Public Hearings <br />Aril 25, 2017 <br />Zack Carlton, Planning Manager <br />Item Description <br />Reviewed by <br />Satellite Shelters — Ordinance Amendment <br />Chris Leeseber , Senior Planner <br />Reviewed by <br />■ Ordinance Amendment to allow outdoor storage <br />as a principal use, Case No. OA 17 -06 <br />Action Requested <br />Recommend, by motion, approval of an ordinance amendment that will remove the requirement for <br />outdoor storage to be a principal use in the I -3 zoning district. <br />Background /Discussion <br />The applicant, Satellite Shelters, is proposing to establish a storage facility within the I -3 (General <br />Industrial) district. Ordinance currently requires outdoor storage to be accessory to a principal use, <br />meaning that an office, warehouse, manufacturing or other type of facility needs to be on the site as well. <br />This is standard across all city districts. However, the proposal would only be for the storage of their <br />equipment, and would not include another principal use. <br />The applicant notes that this would be a good use of the property today, as there are very few <br />improvements needed to establish the proposed use, and it leaves a lot of development potential for a <br />future user. No infrastructure is needed beyond a fence and landscaping, so there is not a lot of <br />modification /demolition needed for a new user. <br />Analysis <br />Staff discussed the proposed amendment during the site plan meeting on April 3, 2017, and had some <br />concerns with impacts to community aesthetics along Highway 10 and whether or not outdoor storage <br />only is the highest and best use of a property. <br />Staff brought these concerns to the City Council during a work session on April 17, 2017, for their <br />comments on the proposed amendment. Council shared many of staffs concerns regarding aesthetics, <br />specifically along Highway 10 near the entrance to the city. One alternative mentioned by the City <br />Attorney was the possibility of a greater setback for properties devoted only to outdoor storage. The <br />setback requirement would also include additional screening to mitigate the potential aesthetic impacts. <br />Staff received direction to explore the larger setback and screening requirements. <br />Ordinance Proposal <br />The outdoor storage ordinance passed last fall requires either a fence, or a three foot berm and vegetative <br />landscaping. In order to provide an efficient level of screening for parcels in the I -3 district which abut <br />Highway 10, staff recommends requiring both a six foot tall opaque fence (not chainlink and slats) and a <br />landscaped vegetative screen. The vegetative screen must be approved by staff, and will need to include a <br />mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs. The additional screening will not count towards the <br />PV0WIRID <br />Template Updated 4/14 INATUOjE <br />