My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4. SR 04-19-1999
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1999
>
04/19/1999
>
6.4. SR 04-19-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:15 AM
Creation date
2/24/2005 3:52:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />did not seem practical given the location of the lot. Staff felt a more realistic <br />approach would be to treat each business as freestanding in terms of <br />applying the sign agreement. <br /> <br /> <br />Memo to Mayor and City Council <br />April 17, 1999 <br />Page <br /> <br />Freestanding buildings are allowed one wall sign unless the building abuts 2 <br />or more public streets. In this case the building abuts three streets so they <br />would be allowed a total of three wall signs if the building was occupied by a <br />single tenant. However, since the building has two tenants, each tenant will <br />need its own signange. Each tenant has frontage on two streets. Hollywood <br />Video has frontage on Highway 169 and 191st Avenue and Leeann Chin has <br />frontage on Freeport Street and 191st Avenue. <br /> <br />It is staffs interpretation that according the existing sign agreement each <br />tenant is allowed two wall signs, one for each street frontage. The applicant <br />is not disputing that interpretation. What they are requesting is the sign <br />agreement be amended to allow additional signage on the awnings. None of <br />the other buildings or businesses in the center have signage on the awnings. <br /> <br />Plannin{f Commission Meeting <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At the March 23rd Planning Commission meeting no one spoke at the public <br />hearing. The applicant explained they need the extra signage because it is <br />part of their standard package. The Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of Leann Chin's request. Most felt the awning signs would not be a <br />problem and the building was unique in that it is a freestanding site with <br />multiple tenants and a PUD allows flexibility to address unique situations. <br />There was some discussion about setting a precedent by allowing additional <br />slgnage. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Leann <br />Chin's request to amend the Elk Park Center PUD agreement to allow non <br />back lit awning signs on the north and west sides of their building. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />s: \PLANNING\SCOTT\LEEANNCC.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.