Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The analysis is presented in a table format for each potential station location in the corridor. <br />A general overview is provided to identify areas that mayor may not be impacted. A more <br />thorough evaluation of potential impacts in these areas will be completed during the <br />preparation of the environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Northstar commuter rail <br />system. <br /> <br />Results of the analysis provided an initial assessment as to whether the proposed locations are <br />conducive to supporting a commuter rail station and station activity. Responses from <br />community representatives were positive overall, and many communities have started <br />planning for potential land use and community development around the station sites. In some <br />areas, land acquisitions may be necessary to accommodate anticipated use. Additional <br />findings from the analysis include the following: <br /> <br />. Regionally, air quality will be improved by the commuter rail system. However, there <br />may be increased carbon monoxide emissions at station sites where large park and ride <br />lots are planned. Additionally, increased vehicular traffic accessing station sites may also <br />increase carbon monoxide emissions <br />. Increased noise levels resulting from commuter rail and station activity appeared to be <br />minor at this phase of the study, due to existing volumes of freight traffic already <br />experienced by the surrounding communities. <br />. The proposed station sites are located in areas currently serving commercial and/or <br />industrial development. Construction of a station in these areas is expected to enhance or <br />improve the overall visual landscape in the area. <br />. Physical impacts on areas such as floodplains, wetlands and prime farmlands, are minor in <br />the majority of proposed site locations. <br />. Archeological and historical impacts vary by location. Sites close to rivers or lakes have <br />higher probability levels of existing archeological resources. Examples include sites in <br />Big Lake, Ramsey/Anoka, Fridley, and downtown Minneapolis. Historical resources are <br />abundant in downtown St. Cloud and northeast Minneapolis; each of the two proposed <br />station areas include historical districts and numerous historically important sites. <br />. Based on the anticipated number of commuters utilizing the stations, rural areas are <br />expected to accommodate the travel demand to the stations with few improvements in <br />comparison to areas such as St. Cloud, Elk River and communities south. Further <br />evaluation will be conducted to determine necessary improvements regarding safety and <br />sufficient roadway access. <br />. Anticipated parking needs have been identified for each station location. Adequate space <br />to build parking areas at each station has not been evaluated. <br />. Construction will impact areas around station sites, segments, maintenance facilities and <br />Northtown Yard. Most construction impacts will be short-term and will be properly <br />mitigated during the construction phase of the commuter rail system. Typical construction <br />impacts include: air quality (dust from earthwork), noise and vibration, neighborhood, <br />natural environment, municipal infrastructure, and water quality. <br /> <br />Additionally, regional and state economic impacts would result from the construction of <br />the Northstar commuter rail system. <br /> <br />Commuter Rail Feasibility Study <br />March 24, 1999 <br /> <br />8-3 <br />Social and Environmental Impacts <br />