4.1. DRAFT MINUTES 05-01-2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes Page 9 April 17, 2017 ----------------------------- Ryan Hardin, representing the applicant – explained at this point the applicant is only requesting a zone change and the Council would consider a Conditional Use Permit at a later date in which they could impose conditions the applicant would be required to comply with. He distributed photos showing outdoor storage throughout the city. Attorney Beck indicated the Council doesn’t always have full discretion on approval or denial of Conditional Use Permits. Mr. Beck suggested imposing a super setback requirement on the property. Various options were discussed and it was noted even with a super setback, the applicant would be required to apply for a variance to use more than 50% of their land area for storage. Mr. Carlton indicated staff spoke to the applicant about applying for an Interim Use Permit; however, the applicant was looking for 20-year approval and the city’s Interim Use Permits have typically been five years or less. Council consensus was for staff to discuss the super setback/more stringent screening requirements with the applicant and to bring the request back. 9.3 Chamber of Commerce Building Improvements Representatives from Mitlyng Designs presented proposed plans for the Chamber building as commissioned by Chamber representatives. It was noted the estimated cost for the improvements as proposed is $350,000-$400,000. Mayor Dietz questioned who pays for the improvements. Mr. Portner explained the lease dictates the lessee is responsible for upkeep and maintenance but believes it could be a possible cost-share opportunity. Mayor Dietz questioned if it makes sense to sell the building to the Chamber. Ms. Rydberg explained the Chamber is not in a position to own property and it doesn’t make sense for a Chamber this size to own the building. Mayor Dietz indicated he is not sure how taxpayers would feel about funding the Chamber improvements. He noted he is not downgrading the Chamber but wants to be fair to other entities in the city. Ms. Rydberg explained the Chamber is an economic development tool for the city. She added it’s the first place many people stop when they are looking at Elk River as a potential home. Mr. Portner added it would remain a city-owned facility. Councilmember Wagner suggested improving the building to be an energy showcase. Councilmember Westgaard wanted to explore the possibility of the city funding the improvements and the Chamber reimbursing the city through the lease. Mayor Dietz questioned if the Chamber could afford an increase in their lease payment. Ms. Rydberg explained the Chamber would be looking at a capital campaign, grant options, and in-kind donations to help defray the costs.