Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Request for Action <br /> <br /> <br />To Item Number <br /> <br />Planning Commission 6.8 <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br /> <br />Public HearingsMarch 28, 2017BrieAnna Simon, Planner <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br /> <br />City of Elk River Ordinance Amendment Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner <br />Ordinance amendment to expand opportunities <br />Reviewed by <br />for the keeping of chickens in residential areas, <br />Zack Carlton, Planning Manager <br />Case No. OA 17-03 <br />Action Requested <br /> <br />Recommend, by motion, approval of the Ordinance Amendment as proposed. <br />Why is this amendment being proposed? <br />Every year staff receives numerous calls asking if chickens are permitted within the urban <br />specifically on lot sizes less than five acres in size. The ordinance currently requires five acres of land and <br />a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for lots within the urban service <br />urban service district, chickens are permitted on properties less than five acres in size with a Conditional <br />Use Permit. If the a property is greater than five acres in size <br />chickens are permitted and the number of chickens can be doubled within <br />the City of Elk River, if the property lot size and required per <br />permitted to have 0.01 animal units per one acres of fenced past <br />fenced pasture land. <br />Staff brought this information to the City Council during a work session to discuss <br />ordinance, and staff was directed to look into a possible amendm <br />vey are described below, <br /> <br />but there is support for allowing chickens on properties of all <br />What is the public benefit? <br />Based on the support shown in the survey, a majority of resident <br />chickens expanded to smaller lots, specifically those below 2.5 <br />district. Additionally, the survey asked questions on the number of chickens to allow, specific regulations <br />on the keeping of chickens, and permitting requirements. This survey was open to everyone, not just <br />residents of Elk River. After eliminating duplicates, the survey6 responses with 70 percent <br />of those surveyed in favor of permitting chickens on smaller lotOf the survey participants 89 <br />percent lived in the City of Elk River, of which 71 percent said <br />on smaller lot sizes. <br />The proposed amendment expands opportunities for the keeping of chickens <br />intended to reduce impacts to neighboring properties. <br /> <br />