My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1 PCSR 04-25-2017 DRAFT MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
04-25-2017
>
4.1 PCSR 04-25-2017 DRAFT MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2017 3:27:34 PM
Creation date
4/21/2017 3:27:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
4/25/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 <br />March 28, 2017 <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner asked how the size of the chicken coops would be regulated. Ms. <br />Simon explained that typical lots are allowed 1,200 square feet of accessory structure <br />including attached and detached, and that only 2 detached struct <br />maximum number of detached structures allowed on large lots is 4 <br />asked if the property owner would be required to take down the coop if it was no longer in <br />use. Ms. Simon stated no, it would be the same as any other detached structure. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding opaque fencing of the coops and ru <br />of the Commission that requiring opaque fencing of the coops or runs themselves would <br />defeat the purpose of raising free-range/cage-free chickens. Fu <br />regarding multi-family residences. It was the consensus that raising chickens would not be <br />an option for multi-family or two-family residential. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Dan Cooper, 17869 Lincoln Street NW, stated that he lived on a 1-acre lot and had chickens. <br />He stated that opaque fencing would not be conducive to healthy chickens. He stated that <br />he did not feel fencing was necessary on his approximately 1 acr <br />land. He stated that if fencing were required, he could build o <br />the work himself. Mr. Cooper discussed the benefits of raising chickens. He stated that an <br />opaque fence would be too expensive and would cost $900 or more. Mr. Cooper asked why <br />compliance checks are being proposed, as the only city that requ <br />stated that there are no compliance checks for dogs and their ke <br />would be unfair since their chickens are pets. Mr. Cooper stated that Elk RiverÔs ordinance <br />as proposed would be the second most restrictive of all of the c <br /> <br />Greg Wierschke, 19227 Yale Street NW, stated he has had the opportunity to raise chicken <br />near a residential neighborhood on the Burandt property for the last four years. He stated <br />that he has found the best shelter to be 8Ôx 8Ô x 2Ô. He stated he only has had one predator <br />problem in that time. Mr. Wierschke suggested that applicants provide an invoice that the <br />states the chickens were purchased from a hatchery registered wi <br />ensure they are disease-free. He stated that his runs and coops are portable and can be taken <br />apart and moved. He stated that the permanent structures being discussed would cost $900 <br />- $1,000 and his cost $200 - $500. He stated that the chickens can be kept safe and away <br />from view. <br /> <br />th <br />Lori Richard, 14381 190 Ave NW, stated that the number of chickens per lot size needs t <br />be reconsidered. She stated that 4 chickens are not very many and small properties could <br />easily accommodate more than 4, since they donÔt take up much ro <br />chickens and has no problems with animals. She stated that lock <br />coop at night prevents predators from coming around. She felt t <br />accommodate 10 Ï 14 chickens. <br /> <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Johnson closed the <br /> <br />Commissioner Rydberg suggested that some research could be done <br />stated he was in favor of postponing this amendment to next monthÔs Planning Commission <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.