Laserfiche WebLink
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br /> But For Analysis of Jackson Hills Residential Suites TIF Project <br /> March 24,2017 <br /> Page 7 <br /> payments and would have to use other sources to fill any shortfall of tax increment revenues. With internal financing, <br /> the City reimburses the loan with future revenue collections and may risk not repaying itself in full if tax increment <br /> revenues are not sufficient. The developer's financial information includes pay-as-you-go financing. <br /> Conclusion <br /> The developer has requested financial assistance of approximately$500,000 as related to construction of the 40-unit <br /> multi-family affordable housing project. Assistance has been requested as pay-as-you-go financing (supported solely <br /> by tax increments generated from this project). City policy guidelines have indicated the maximum amount the <br /> developer could be eligible for is 65%of the total request to equal a revised amount of$325,000. <br /> Through the submission of the tax increment financing application and supporting financial information, the developer <br /> has indicated that the project as proposed would not occur on the current site without financial assistance from the <br /> City due to the below-market returns and low debt coverage metrics projected to be generated by the project. <br /> Based on the current assumptions, without assistance the project as proposed would not be considered feasible. <br /> With assistance the project is expected to generate returns that the developer has indicated are sufficient to allow the <br /> project to proceed. An overall reduction in project costs and/or increase in revenues may assist with achieving <br /> greater market feasibility in the future. The City may also choose to perform a post-development cost audit to <br /> determine actual costs as opposed to projected (and thus driving the need for public assistance)to determine if the <br /> recommended amount of assistance is appropriate. <br /> Based on the projected performance of the project with assistance, it appears the City will have an opportunity to <br /> reduce the amount of assistance while still meeting the developer's needs. Without assistance, the debt coverage <br /> ratio is 1x and below typical lender standards. Providing annual cash flow assistance will allow the project to achieve <br /> market debt coverage ratios, thus allowing the project to proceed. <br /> It is important to note the project as proposed is providing affordable housing units within the City. By establishing a <br /> Housing TIF District, the developer is agreeing to maintain a portion of the units as affordable (meeting the income <br /> requirements as outlined previously) over the life of district. Without tax increment assistance the developer is not <br /> required to maintain any affordable units. Due to the projected infeasibility of the project based on current <br /> assumptions, absent additional revenue source(s)to meet minimum coverage thresholds, we assume the developer <br /> would increase the rents without assistance, reduce the scope of the project to reduce costs or not proceed with the <br /> project,or some combination. <br /> Based on the provided financing assumptions, there is a financing gap resulting from providing a portion of the units <br /> as affordable and some sort of financial assistance would be necessary to support a portion of the extraordinary <br /> project costs and meet minimum return thresholds that would allow the project as proposed to proceed. To support <br /> this conclusion and as illustrated in the analysis outlined above, the projected debt coverage ratios and rates of <br />