Laserfiche WebLink
<br />land Use and Zoning - legal Review <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br />May 13, 2003 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />The Court of Appeals has held that in determining whether a non- <br />conformed building or structure has been destroyed to an extent of <br />50% or more of its market value, a reviewing authority must consider <br />the market value of the entire non-conforming use. Buss v. Johnson, <br />624 N.W.2d 781 (Minn. App., 2001). <br />5. Amortization. Prior to 2001, zoning ordinances often established an <br />amortization period for pre-existing, non-conforming uses. These <br />ordinances typically provided that at the expiration of the <br />amortization period the use must cease. Courts typically upheld such <br />amortization periods, holding that the adoption of an ordinance <br />establishing an amortization period is a legislative act to which the <br />courts should afford great deference, even when the amortization <br />period was as short as two years. See A VR Inc. v. City of St. Louis <br />Park, 585 N.W.2d 411 (Minn. App., 1998). <br />However, the 2001 Legislature also addressed the issue of <br />amortization, enacting Minn. Stat. ~462.357, Subd. 1 (c), which <br />provides as follows: <br />Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, a <br />municipality must not enact, amend or enforce an <br />ordinance providing for the elimiflation or <br />termination of a use by amortization which use was <br />lawful at the time of its inception. This subdivision <br />does not apply to adults-only bookstores, adults-only <br />theaters, or similar adults-only businesses, as defined <br />by ordinance. <br />This statute also supercedes local zoning ordinances, and prohibits <br />local government from amortizing out non-conforming uses, except <br />those uses specified in the last sentence of the ordinance. <br />B. Moratoria. <br />1. Authorization. Minn. Stat. ~462.355 Subd. 4. Specifically authorizes <br />the adoption of Moratoria, defined in the statute as "interim <br />ordinances", as follows: <br />If a municipality is conducting studies or has <br />authorized a study to be conducted or has held or has <br />scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering <br />adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan or <br />official controls as defined in Section 462.352. <br />Subdivision 15, or if new territory for which plans or <br />controls have not been adopted is annexed to a <br />municipality, the governing body of the municipality <br />may adopt an interim ordinance applicable to all or <br />part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting <br />the planning process and the health, safety and <br />welfare of its citizens. The interim ordinance may <br />regulate, restrict or prohibit any use, development, or <br />