My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.0 PRSR 03-09-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2017
>
03-09-2017
>
8.0 PRSR 03-09-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2017 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
3/17/2017 11:49:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
3/9/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> trunk. Dutch elm disease was first recorded in Minnesota near Monticello in 1961, <br /> and has since spread throughout the state. Minnesota relied heavily on American <br /> Elms (Ulmus americana) as shade trees on streets,with about 140 million in the <br /> state at the time of the outbreak.The disease is now present in all Minnesota <br /> counties,though elms remain an important component of many Minnesota forests. <br /> Emerald ash borer (EAB) is a non-native wood-boring beetle from Asia that was first <br /> identified in the United States in the summer of 2002. Likely transported from Asia <br /> to Michigan in ash wood used for pallets and other shipping materials,the beetle has <br /> now been confirmed in 15 states, including Minnesota.The beetle works by <br /> depositing larvae under the bark of the tree; these larvae then feed on the wood, <br /> eventually disrupting enough of the phloem to prevent the transport of nutrients <br /> throughout the tree.While Minnesota's cold weather can stymie the spread of the <br /> beetle, it continues to spread,with new outbreaks confirmed in and around the <br /> metro area. Quarantines are already in place around both Hennepin and Anoka <br /> counties,where infestations of the borer have been confirmed. Both of these <br /> counties share a border with Sherburne county,meaning that ash trees within the <br /> Conservation Area are at risk.With risks such as human movement of firewood and <br /> climate change ever-present,the likelihood that EAB might reach the property is <br /> high,though the search for effective biological controls and other deterrents is <br /> ongoing. <br /> Unless viable control or treatment options are developed,the elms and ash on the <br /> property are at risk of dying in the near future. When such large trees die,it will <br /> have a pronounced effect on the vegetation and the water in the river. These trees <br /> act to shade the water and provide habitat and improve water quality for fish and <br /> other species. When large trees die,they open up the canopy and create gaps,which <br /> in turn releases the understory that was formerly suppressed by the shade from <br /> such trees. If desirable species like native forbs, grasses, sedges,and shrubs exist in <br /> the understory,then this can be a good thing,since the result will probably be a net <br /> increase in bank stability and diversity. In the case of this property,these canopy <br /> gaps will likely be filled by buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle,which are poised to <br /> take advantage of such a situation. In order to avoid this undesirable scenario,active <br /> management is recommended. Removal of undesirable shrub species and replacing <br /> them with desirable native shrubs and herbaceous plant species is a recommended <br /> management strategy. <br /> For green ash in particular,the situation is particularly important,as this species <br /> makes up over 50% of the canopy in many areas of the floodplain forest.The <br /> principle of risk is highly applicable here; risk is often defined as the probability of a <br /> negative event weighted by its consequences. In the case of EAB,the consequences <br /> will be large and quite negative,as a loss of half the canopy on the property could <br /> have cascading consequences for invasive species,water quality,and wildlife.The <br /> probability that EAB arrives is high,though it is unclear when this will occur.While <br /> we plan to remove invasive species prior to this occurring,which will reduce some <br /> of the negative consequences, another potential strategy is to proactively remove <br /> Friends of the Mississippi River Bailey Point Nature Preserve NRMP <br /> 66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.