My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1a ERMUSR 03-13-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2017
>
03-13-2017
>
6.1a ERMUSR 03-13-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 2:17:46 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 2:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/13/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DMDMIL( <br /> ffiriffirviridr,g <br /> p1- . , <br /> 10744' -.wry <br /> p a <br /> } r <br /> $n <br /> photo courtesy of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services <br /> The St. Croix Valley wastewater treatment plant is one of eight owned by the Metropolitan Council.Total projected capital <br /> cost,through 2030,for the Metropolitan system was recently estimated at approximately$3.8 billion. <br /> borrowing costs by 32 to 35 percent. Further, some It seems counterintuitive that while Congress and <br /> proposals would apply retroactively to $3.7 trillion the White House seem to recognize the urgent need <br /> of existing bonds, imposing a significant financial for public infrastructure replacement, some are <br /> burden on public power communities. Replacing looking to limit the one tool that local governments <br /> the exclusion for municipal bonds with a direct have to control costs as they make the necessary <br /> payment bond, as others suggest, would increase investments. <br /> borrowing costs by 16 percent (assuming a direct <br /> payment percentage of 25 percent of the issuer's MMUA Position <br /> interest expenses). We urge Congress to preserve the traditional tax- <br /> exempt financing tools used by local governments <br /> In short, any proposals to tax municipal bonds since the development of the federal tax code <br /> would impose higher borrowing costs on cities and more than a hundred years ago, and to reject all <br /> other local governments and discourage investment proposals that would limit or eliminate the tax- <br /> in critical infrastructure. Increased borrowing exempt status for municipal bonds, including <br /> costs would lead to higher taxes and higher rates replacing muni bonds with tax credits or"direct <br /> for municipal electric, water, and wastewater payment bonds." <br /> services. <br /> 2017 Federal Position Statements/4 <br /> 173 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.