My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1a ERMUSR 03-13-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2017
>
03-13-2017
>
6.1a ERMUSR 03-13-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 2:17:46 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 2:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/13/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AMERICAN <br /> PUBLiC <br /> POWER.. <br /> ASSOCIATION <br /> Powering Strong Communities <br /> ISSUE BRIEF January 2017 <br /> Rail Competition and Antitrust Enforcement <br /> Summary of shippers,from farmers to chemical manufacturers to defense <br /> Electric utilities rely on rail transportation to move the vast contractors,have experienced these same problems.In the last <br /> majority of coal from mine mouths to power plants.Many few years,utilities have experienced extensive issues receiving <br /> coal-burning electric utilities have no choice but to receive their coal shipments on time(as have other commodities groups <br /> coal shipments from only one rail carrier,and thus are subject with their products),leading to concerns about electric reliabil- <br /> to monopolistic behavior.As a result,these rail customers are ity due to the dwindling size of coal stacks.These service issues <br /> are only exacerbated by the railroads'anticompetitive practices. <br /> unable to negotiate the terms of their rail transportation in an <br /> open and competitive market.These"captive"rail customers are The monopoly power of the railroads over captive shippers <br /> charged higher rail rates while customers with more than one vi- has grown dramatically in the last 36 years.Since 1980,the in- <br /> able transportation option pay lower,competitively priced rates. dustry has been reduced from 42 major carriers to five,with 95 <br /> Over the past several years,rail customers also have experienced percent of the market share dominated by four carriers.In 1995, <br /> Congress abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and <br /> numerous service and reliability problems,with no relief. <br /> The American Public Power Association(Association or gave the newly created STB authority over the rail industry for <br /> APPA)and its members have been active in proceedings at the mergers,rate and service disputes,and construction,operation, <br /> Surface Transportation Board(STB) on issues important to and/or abandonment of railroad lines.Since its creation,the <br /> STB has failed to use the legal and regulatory mechanisms at its <br /> captive shippers.While these proceedings could result in some <br /> disposal to protect rail customers from monopolistic practices by <br /> regulatory improvements,legislative remedies are still required <br /> railroads.As a result,many rail customers have simply foregone <br /> to enhance competitive transportation and improve rail custom <br /> filing rate cases at the STB due to the low probability of success, <br /> er protection mechanisms and enforcement implemented by the <br /> STB.Absent congressional action,electric utilities and the com- as well as the high costs of filing and litigation.These problems <br /> can be resolved by reforms to the STB process and by subjecting <br /> munities they serve will continue to be subject to unnecessarily <br /> higher rates and poorer service for coal transportation.In recent railroads to the major provisions of two major federal antitrust <br /> Congresses,the Association has supported bills that would have laws,the Sherman and Clayton Acts. Railroads are uniquely <br /> placed the railroads under antitrust law and reformed the STB. exempt from the nation's antitrust laws for mergers,consolida- <br /> tions,acquisitions,and pooling arrangements approved by the <br /> APPA continues to support such efforts. <br /> STB.These exemptions give railroads immunity from lawsuits <br /> filed by state attorneys general,the Department of Justice,and <br /> Background private citizens.These exemptions have allowed for a wide range <br /> Thirty-three percent of the nation's electricity is generated from of anticompetitive rail industry practices. <br /> coal,the vast majority of which is transported by rail.A substan- <br /> tial amount of that coal has only one option for railroad trans- <br /> portation for at least a portion of its shipment.Thus,a large Congressional Action <br /> amount of the coal used to generate electricity in this country On December 18,2015,President Obama signed into law <br /> is"captive"to a single railroad for transportation.The transpor- S.808,the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act of 2015 <br /> tation costs for shipping that coal reflect the monopoly power (PL 114-110).This was the first time that the STB had been <br /> of the carrier,and are therefore frequently unreasonably high. reauthorized since 1998.APPA,along with the Freight Rail <br /> While public power's interests relate to the movement of coal, Customers Alliance(FRCA),of which the Association is a <br /> this issue is by no means restricted to coal shippers.A variety Board Member,was heavily involved in the bill's development <br /> PubLicPower.org 35 <br /> 217 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.