Laserfiche WebLink
DMDMLf3/4. <br /> . o <br /> ... ,... <br /> ., , ., , <br /> . , <br /> „.. , „ , _ <br /> ys <br /> a r <br /> r <br /> I <br /> , £ <br /> 4 <br /> : � 4 , <br /> { ya .. Lai. <br /> fi.. <br /> r `� <br /> .. ra <br /> ' . ,rt v ;4ir fi.# <br /> Municipal utilities are increasingly pursuing"community solar.gardens."This ribbon cutting for the second phase of the <br /> Moorhead Public Service solar plant occured in October 2016. <br /> and maintenance costs. Customers in publicDecisions on how to fairly distribute the cost of <br /> power cities trust their locally-owned utility, and providing all customers with a fully accessible and <br /> oca <br /> community solar projects can help them achieve reable electric systeare bestmade at the ll <br /> environmental stewardship while removing levelil. Congress shouldm fully resist proposals that <br /> problematic rate cross-subsidization concerns that attempt to federalize decision makimng about how <br /> impact others, most particularly low and fixed utilities design their rates and charges. Congress <br /> income customers. shoualso resist attempts to mit or remove <br /> utilitildes' ability to create and operate <br /> licommunity <br /> MMUA Position solar projects. <br /> As many states do, Minnesota allows the local <br /> governing bodies of consumer-owned municipal <br /> and cooperative utilities to design their rates <br /> based on factors specific to the utility system and <br /> the characteristics of the customer base it serves. <br /> 2017 Federal Position Statements/8 <br /> 177 <br />