4.4. SR 03-15-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

· A TSM Alternative must be represented that is politically and financially as a point of . comparison. · The Build Alternative represented in the model (commuter rail) should reflect a feeder bus system that.isfinancially .achievable to secure Ff A approval. Outputs from the refinement of the ridership projections wiRincludethe foUowing'varieb"les.- · Daily and peak ridership by direction · Boardings and alightings a!ld each station · Individual link volumes · Station-to-stationvolumes · A verage speed and trip length comparisons · Transfer incidence and patterns · Feeder bus ridership · Diversion of auto trips to transit · Auto trip access to stations · Peak-hour transit trips by mode and line Additionally, travel model related indices will be prepared for submittal input to the New Starts Criteria and will include travel time savings, incremental trips, passenger miles, and passenger hours. 2.6 Financial Plan The financial plan will define the following: . · Revenue stream required for capital costs. · Revenue stream required for the operating costs. · Amount of candidate revenue sources including innovative sources, from federal, state, regional, and local governments. 2.7 Implementation Plan The implementation plan will identify the implementation method to be used; candidate methods are: · Design, bid and build (traditional) · Design/build · Design/build/operate/maintain . The institutional. arrangements will also be defined for design, construction, and operation of the commuter rail service and feeder bus service. This task will include coordination with Metro Transit, S1. Cloud MTC, Metropolitan Council and MnlDOT. . Work Program for Northstar Corridor MIS and EIS For the Proposed Commuter Rail Service February 25, 1999 '-- ~.-~ 8 Work Program