Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />alignment and station costs and less convenient passenger access to stations. Stop spacing for bus <br />service is closer than other modes, every one to two blocks or 300 to 500 feet typically. Station <br />spacing of one-quarter to one-half mile is comparable for Bus Rapid Transit, LRT, DMU and AGT; <br />station spacing for Commuter Rail, Heavy Rail, and Monorail is typically wider, two to five miles <br />or more. The primary environmental impact for all technologies requiring grade separation is <br />visual intrusion; other impacts for all alternatives include traffic, noise and emissions. A more <br />detailed evaluation of each technology is presented in the following sections. <br /> <br />a. Bus <br /> <br />Diesel Bus <br /> <br />The primary advantages of diesel bus operation are low cost and high flexibility. <br /> <br />· Buses generally operate over existing roadways and therefore do not require a significant <br />additional investment in infrastructure. Capital costs are primarily limited to vehicles. <br /> <br />· Routes can be flexible. Routing changes can be implemented, for all practical purposes, <br />immediately. <br /> <br />· Buses can serve a wide range of passenger demand and bus size can be adapted to <br />passenger loads. <br /> <br />Electric Trolley Bus <br /> <br />Electric trolley buses offer a distinct advantage in acceleration and are efficient for routes <br />characterized by steep grades and high frequencies. Electric trolley buses are more limited in <br />their maneuverability than diesel buses. Trolley bus operation is quiet and non-polluting. <br />However, electrification requires a significant investment and overhead wire at junctions can <br />be perceived as visually intrusive. <br /> <br />Bus stops are typically low cost and easily accessible since stop spacing is close. Buses along <br />street and roadways are subject to traffic delays. Trolley bus maneuverability is limited and <br />immediate route deviations are not possible. Trolley buses find their most appropriate use for <br />heavily used frequently operating routes characterized by steep grades, not a characteristic of <br />the Northstar Corridor study area. Diesel emissions create an environmental impact; however, <br />justification of trolley buses for moderate ridership routes is unlikely. Utilization of <br />alternative-fuel-powered standard buses poses a more feasible method to mitigate bus pollution <br />impacts. <br /> <br />Bus transit is ~ecommended for further study. <br /> <br />Northstar Corridor Major Investment Study <br />Conceptual Definition of Alternatives <br />February 1999 <br /> <br />III-9 <br />