My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 02-21-2017
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2017
>
02-21-2017
>
7.1. SR 02-21-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2017 12:06:43 PM
Creation date
2/16/2017 3:43:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/21/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? __Yes _X_No. If yes, describe the <br />new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action <br />with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) <br /> <br />29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU <br />consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining <br />the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable <br />future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause <br />cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available <br />information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due <br />to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this <br />form). <br /> <br />The Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Elk River Gravel Mining District which <br />encompassed 2,865 acres immediately adjacent to the 36.6 acres of the proposed project, reviewed <br />cumulative impacts for potential environmental effects of mineral extraction relative to noise, air <br />quality, traffic, dust, surface and ground water quality, and disruption of native flora and fauna as well <br />as cumulative impacts related to social and economic issues. The City, as the responsible <br />governmental unit (RGU) for performing the review, concluded that any negative effects could be <br />regulated within the framework of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) issued for each individual mining <br />operation. The CUP for Tiller’s existing facility includes conditions which address and satisfactorily <br />regulate potential environmental impacts associated with noise, dust, surface and groundwater <br />protection, and site restoration. <br /> <br />30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts <br />not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. <br /> <br /> No other environmental impacts are anticipated. <br /> <br />31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, <br />address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List <br />any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is <br />begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these <br />impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. <br /> <br />Ecologically sensitive resources: An Oak forest native community is located near the proposed site. <br />Although the project will not directly impact this woodland community, indirect impacts from runoff <br />and the introduction/spread of invasive species should be considered. Runoff from the proposed <br />mining area will be controlled and contained on site through the implementation of Best Management <br />Practices as outlined in the site’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Untreated stormwater <br />contacting exposed soils will not be discharged off site. These practices include silt fence, stormwater <br />diversion berms, establishment of vegetation, temporary sedimentation basins and infiltration areas and <br />vegetation of reclaimed areas. The majority of the Oak forest native community is located with <br />designated City park land and will be managed in accordance with the City’s management plan to <br />minimize invasive species impacts. <br /> <br />Noise: Noise is produced from the mining and processing equipment. The equipment is subject to <br />setbacks from property boundaries and is situated at an elevation several feet below nearby receptors. <br />A noise analysis was completed and concluded that the proposed operation can be conducted in <br />compliance with state noise standards. As operations move toward nearby receptors, additional <br />monitoring will be conducted to ensure compliance. <br /> <br />Dust: Dust emissions are predominantly due to vehicular travel on internal unpaved haul roads. <br />Conveyors will be used to transport the excavated material to the operations area for additional <br />processing, minimizing truck travel in the mining operation. The main processing and stockpiling area <br />is hard surfaced and a water truck is maintained on-site and used for frequent watering of internal haul
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.