Laserfiche WebLink
6. 1Vill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. <br /> The EAW determined the proposed operation would not result in non-reclaimable environmental <br /> degradation. The reclamation plan developed by the operation will return the property to environmental <br /> standards. No historic features were identified through the EAW process. <br /> 7. LVill fully comply Pitb all other requirements of this code, including any applicable requirements and standards for the <br /> issuance of a license orpeimit to establish and operate the proposed use in the city. <br /> The applicant is required to comply with all other sections of the code and must apply for all required <br /> building permits in addition to the CUP. If denial of such a permit should occur,it shall accompany <br /> findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section <br /> 30-654. In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined,it appears that the request is consistent with <br /> all of these standards. <br /> Financial Impact <br /> None <br /> Planning Commission Meeting <br /> No one spoke for or against the request and staff has not received any comments from the public. The <br /> Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. <br /> Attachments <br /> ■ Location Map <br /> ■ Zoning Map <br /> ■ Zone Change and CUP Application December 2016 <br /> ■ Phase Map <br /> ■ Setback Map <br /> ■ Reclamation Map <br /> ■ EAW Resolution November 7, 2016 <br /> ■ EAW April 2007 <br /> ■ Ordinance <br /> N:APublic Bodies\Agenda Packets\02-21-2017\Final\7.1 sr CU 17-02 11ax Steininger CC Report.docx <br />