Laserfiche WebLink
fifteen known concentration priority areas determined by the DNR to be relied upon to maintain the <br />species’ security within the state. However, the DNR recommends that certain guidelines be followed <br />during all construction activity in the area. <br /> <br />The Red Shouldered Hawk, a special Concern Species, and a Uncas Skipper, an endangered butterfly, <br />has also been observed within approximately 1 mile of the subject property. However, based upon the <br />review by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, these elements are not likely to be <br />impacted by the proposed project. <br /> <br />A copy of the MNDNR review letter and the list of recommended measures for avoiding and <br />minimizing impacts to Blandings Turtle are included as Attachment 1. <br /> <br />12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration <br />— dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment — of any surface <br />waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? __Yes X No <br />If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the <br />water resources affected are on the PWI: . Describe alternatives considered and proposed <br />mitigation measures to minimize impacts. <br /> <br />13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or <br />changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including <br />dewatering)? __Yes X No <br />If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be <br />made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any <br />appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify <br />any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology <br />used to determine. <br /> <br />No new wells will be installed onsite. Material extracted from the expansion area will be conveyed to <br />an aggregate processing area in the adjacent existing mining operation. The existing mining facility <br />operates a washplant. The well associated with the washplant operates under DNR Water <br />Appropriations Permit # 1991-3086. There is also a potable well located in the operations area which <br />serves the scale building. The proposed additional mining area will not impact or require any changes <br />to the existing permit. <br /> <br />14. Water-related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland <br />zoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river <br />land use district? __Yes X No <br /> If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. <br /> <br />The Flood Insurance Rate Map for Sherburne County indicates the site is not located within any <br />delineated 100-year flood plain. The site does not fall within a shoreland zoning district or a state or a <br />federally designated wild or scenic river land use district. <br /> <br />15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? <br />__Yes X No <br /> If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or <br />conflicts with other uses. <br /> <br />16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to <br />be moved: <br /> acres 20; cubic yards 400,000 cy net quantity of material to be removed. Describe any steep slopes or <br />highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control <br />measures to be used during and after project construction. <br /> <br /> The on site soils are in general susceptible to erosion. Historically, they have been subjected to wind