Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Elk River City Council Minutes <br />February 22. 1999 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing indicated that she would have supported the smaller project, <br />however she will not vote in favor of the large project due to her concern <br />regarding funding of the project. <br /> <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 4-1. Mayor Klinzing opposed. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ AUTHORIZED THE USE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br />FUNDS TO MAKE UP FOR THE TRUNK SEWER LINE SHORTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY <br />$200,000 OVER THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. COUNCILMEMBER THOMPSON SECONDED <br />THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />6.4. Resolution Establishina Park Dedication Fees for 1999 <br /> <br />John Kuester, park and recreation commissioner, indicated that the Park and <br />Recreation Commission is recommending the Council increase park dedication <br />fees. He indicated that staff has researched park dedication fees in other cities <br />and determined that Elk River park fees are not in line with surrounding <br />communities. Commissioner Kuester noted that the Park and Recreation <br />Commission feels their recommendation to increase the fees has been carefully <br />thought through, is fair, and has been done in a strategic manner. John Kuester <br />stated that people moving into the City want a park system to meet their needs. <br />He further noted that land values have increased in Sherburne County by about 70 <br />percent since the last time park dedication fees have been increased. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Farber stated that he concurs the City needs to increase its park <br />fees, however he questioned why there is no graduation in the increase. He <br />indicated that he is concerned with the fairness of increasing the fees so drastically <br />at one time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thompson noted that he feels the proposal is fair, however, he is <br />also concerned about not phasing in the increase. He further noted his concern as <br />to how this increase would impact developers currently in the platting process. <br /> <br />Council member Dietz stated that Elk River is in demand and this is not the time to <br />be concerned about increasing its fees. He noted that the increase in the park <br />dedication fee is a step in the right direction so people can have the park system <br />they expect to have for a City the size of Elk River. Council member Dietz <br />questioned the reasoning and necessity of charging park dedication fees for <br />industrial property. Councilmember Dietz further indicated that he would not be in <br />favor of phasing in the increase. <br /> <br />Council member Motin indicated that Elk River must be compared to neighboring <br />metropolitan. He further indicated that he has concerns regarding industrial <br />property paying park dedication fees. He stated he would prefer to see plats that <br />are in the planning stages be grandfathered-in some way so they are not stuck <br />with the entire increase without having planned for the increase. <br /> <br />Homer Tompkins, developer of Trott Brook Farms, indicated that they are proposing <br />to develop a park and to pay their park dedication up front and questioned how <br />an increase at this time would affect his plat. <br /> <br />e <br />